在班级管理中如何培养学生的创新能力     

马云龙  王振国 《中国教育发展研究杂志》2007,4(1):30-30

江总书记说：“创新是一个民族进步的灵魂，是国家兴旺发达的不竭动力。”作为班主任理应肩负这一重任，要正确看待并重视学生的创新能力，在细微处培养，在群体中发展，从而达到培养群体创新能力的目的。  相似文献   

文化资本与当代“新沂蒙文化”建设     

于静波 《临沂师范学院学报》2012,(3)

近年来,临沂的文化产业发展取得了显著成绩。在新的历史条件下,布迪厄的“文化资本”概念可以作为突破临沂文化产业发展屏障的有益视角。正确科学地对待传统与自然文化资源,解开文化产业进一步发展的理论困境,开拓临沂文化产业发展的思路和策略,是贯彻党的十七届六中全会精神,推动沂蒙文化大发展大繁荣的重要前提。其中,建构以发展、创新为主题的“新沂蒙文化”是临沂文化产业发展的新策略。  相似文献   

大学生逻辑学学习兴趣培养教法改革之探析     

彭麟淋  黎明中 《毕节学院学报》2013,(12):63-67

逻辑是人类以推理、论证的方式追问生活理想以及人的存在方式的产物。它不仅是获取知识的有效工具,更是人类生活、社会发展的理性支点。逻辑回归生活世界,在人类生存的理性辨析中有所担当,以此升华生活境界。这是逻辑精神与人类自由相切契合的体现,也恰是逻辑发展的活力所在,所以对于逻辑学学习的是十分必要的。因此,培养大学生对逻辑学学习的兴趣就显得尤为重要,教学法的研究就是关键。  相似文献   

基于卓越工程师培养的基础创新训练教学研究与实践     

马鹏飞马伟民  张应龙曾艳明 《中国科教创新导刊》2013,(34):16-17

工程训练教学是高校实施“卓越工程师教育培养计划”的重要组成部分,“卓越计划”的重要特点之一就是强化培养学生的”工程能力和创新能力”.我校针对“卓越工程师”基础创新训练教学体系、教学内容和教学方法展开了深入的探索、改革创新和实践,成为了学生提高综合工程素质,培养创新精神和创新能力的重要实践环节.  相似文献   

Public Sector Agricultural Extension System Reform and the Challenges Ahead     

William M. Rivera 《The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension》2013,19(2):165-180

Abstract

This paper is organized into two main sections. The first section examines extension as an engine for innovation and reviews the numerous priorities confronting extension systems. Section two highlights the current knowledge imperative and the critical connection of extension to post-secondary higher education and training, organizational inservice training, and vocationally oriented self-directed learning. Final comments address ‘The Continuing Role of the Public Sector’, and the prospect of its role in balancing societal interests and promoting extension as an aspect of a knowledge economy. The conclusion proposes what may be agricultural extension's challenges ahead.  相似文献   

Role of Brokerage in Evolving Innovation Systems: A Case of the Fodder Innovation Project in Nigeria     

Elias Madzudzo 《The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension》2013,19(2):195-210

Abstract

This paper looks at brokerage functions in a project on building innovation capacity through improved networking. Innovation capacity influences how actors respond to changes in their environments. In such dynamic environments well connected sets of actors are at an advantage in that they can combine skills to address the emerging opportunities and challenges. However, policy and cultural barriers especially in African innovation systems raise the transaction costs of networking leading to weak connectivity among actors thus poor innovation capacity. This paper uses case studies from West Africa to illustrate that actors that play brokerage functions are critical in navigating around or dismantling the barriers and thus enhance innovation capacity. This paper assumes that innovation capacity rather than innovations per se is lacking in African agriculture. The paper is a product of an action research based study of Key Partner Organizations and the coalitions of stakeholders they formed around fodder innovation themes in Nigeria. We show that brokerage negotiates innovation barriers and improve networking. The paper concludes that brokerage roles are context-specific; policies that facilitate eclectic brokerage functions are critical. This paper is shedding light on the broadened scope for actors playing boundary roles, e.g. extension organizations under more relaxed organizational and policy contexts. There are few studies on brokerage and boundary work particularly in African agriculture. This study is a grounded discussion on the brokering functions in African rural development. It uses data from similar programmes to qualify observations and conclusions from the Fodder Innovation Project (FIP) case study.  相似文献   

Learning and Innovation Competence in Agricultural and Rural Development     

Laxmi Prasad Pant 《The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension》2013,19(3):205-230

Abstract

Purpose: The fields of competence development and capacity development remain isolated in the scholarship of learning and innovation despite the contemporary focus on innovation systems thinking in agricultural and rural development. This article aims to address whether and how crossing the conventional boundaries of these two fields provide new directions for developing learning and innovation competence in international development.

Design/methodology/approach: Using mixed methods research, this article assesses work environments for experiential learning and innovation, and investigates effective ways of enhancing core competence in agricultural research, education, extension and entrepreneurship.

Findings: Findings suggest that while the focus on input and output indicators are relevant for technological innovation competence development, outcome indicators, such as measures of changes in cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains of learning and innovation, would better serve the purpose of developing organisational and institutional learning and innovation competence.

Practical implications: This research concludes that crossing the conventional boundaries of competence development and capacity development serves as a way to renew the role of education within the innovation systems thinking. However, such an attempt to enhance human capabilities and functionings through education should integrate theory-based, competence-based and experiential learning components as a coherent whole.

Originality/value: This article demonstrates the value of crossing the conventional boundaries of the two seemingly unrelated fields—competence development through education and capacity development through extension—to provide new directions to operationalise innovation systems thinking in agricultural education and extension.  相似文献   

The Future of Agricultural Education: The Case of the Netherlands     

Martin Mulder  Hendrik Kupper 《The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension》2013,19(2):127-139

  相似文献   

How Dynamics of Learning are Linked to Innovation Support Services: Insights from a Smallholder Commercialization Project in Kenya     

Catherine W. Kilelu  Laurens Klerkx  Cees Leeuwis 《The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension》2013,19(2):213-232

Abstract