排序方式： 共有381条查询结果，搜索用时 234 毫秒
21.
22.
文章首先简要介绍了Google Answers的由来及工作模式,随后分析了人们愿意给Google Answers付费的原因,认为图书馆的参考咨询可以从中得出一些启示,并坚持Google Answers不能取代图书馆的参考咨询服务,图书馆参考咨询拥有更美好的明天. 相似文献
23.
Dale Askey 《图书馆管理杂志》2015,55(1):49-59
Google is the single largest driver of traffic to library Web sites and digital repositories, and librarians would do well to listen when the search giant reveals information about its practices or makes recommendations. Recently, Google announced that it would begin to favor Web sites that use the secure hypertext transfer protocol (HTTPS) in its search results rankings. HTTPS encrypts data transmission and one of Google's stated reasons for this change is to help make the Web safer and minimize data theft. Similar announcements by Google have sometimes been ignored by librarians, to the peril of the visibility and use of library products and services on the Web. 相似文献
24.
Google Earth作为免费软件,三维模型上能十分的丰富和强大,但坐标转换导入功能薄弱,ArcGIS 9.2以上版本支持Google Earth数据(KML/KMZ格式)的矢量数据式转换。文章介绍了一种借助ArcGIS软件实现坐标拐点快速转换并投放到Google Earth地图中的方法和途径,同时介绍了利用Google Earth辅助矿产资源管理的方法。 相似文献
25.
Amanda Spink Bernard J. Jansen Chris Blakely Sherry Koshman 《Information processing & management》2006
The performance and capabilities of Web search engines is an important and significant area of research. Millions of people world wide use Web search engines very day. This paper reports the results of a major study examining the overlap among results retrieved by multiple Web search engines for a large set of more than 10,000 queries. Previous smaller studies have discussed a lack of overlap in results returned by Web search engines for the same queries. The goal of the current study was to conduct a large-scale study to measure the overlap of search results on the first result page (both non-sponsored and sponsored) across the four most popular Web search engines, at specific points in time using a large number of queries. The Web search engines included in the study were MSN Search, Google, Yahoo! and Ask Jeeves. Our study then compares these results with the first page results retrieved for the same queries by the metasearch engine Dogpile.com. Two sets of randomly selected user-entered queries, one set was 10,316 queries and the other 12,570 queries, from Infospace’s Dogpile.com search engine (the first set was from Dogpile, the second was from across the Infospace Network of search properties were submitted to the four single Web search engines). Findings show that the percent of total results unique to only one of the four Web search engines was 84.9%, shared by two of the three Web search engines was 11.4%, shared by three of the Web search engines was 2.6%, and shared by all four Web search engines was 1.1%. This small degree of overlap shows the significant difference in the way major Web search engines retrieve and rank results in response to given queries. Results point to the value of metasearch engines in Web retrieval to overcome the biases of individual search engines. 相似文献
26.
Dissertations can be the single most important scholarly outputs of junior researchers. Whilst sets of journal articles are often evaluated with the help of citation counts from the Web of Science or Scopus, these do not index dissertations and so their impact is hard to assess. In response, this article introduces a new multistage method to extract Google Scholar citation counts for large collections of dissertations from repositories indexed by Google. The method was used to extract Google Scholar citation counts for 77,884 American doctoral dissertations from 2013 to 2017 via ProQuest, with a precision of over 95%. Some ProQuest dissertations that were dual indexed with other repositories could not be retrieved with ProQuest-specific searches but could be found with Google Scholar searches of the other repositories. The Google Scholar citation counts were then compared with Mendeley reader counts, a known source of scholarly-like impact data. A fifth of the dissertations had at least one citation recorded in Google Scholar and slightly fewer had at least one Mendeley reader. Based on numerical comparisons, the Mendeley reader counts seem to be more useful for impact assessment purposes for dissertations that are less than two years old, whilst Google Scholar citations are more useful for older dissertations, especially in social sciences, arts and humanities. Google Scholar citation counts may reflect a more scholarly type of impact than that of Mendeley reader counts because dissertations attract a substantial minority of their citations from other dissertations. In summary, the new method now makes it possible for research funders, institutions and others to systematically evaluate the impact of dissertations, although additional Google Scholar queries for other online repositories are needed to ensure comprehensive coverage. 相似文献
27.
杨森 《济宁师范专科学校学报》2011,(6):122-125
通过利用谷歌在线翻译的具体实例总结分析出机器翻译的得与失,虽然机器翻译目前无法满足人们准确翻译的要求,达到令人满意的程度,但在为人工翻译做准备,提供参考方面,还是有其可取之处的,应对机器翻译的未来发展抱有极大的乐观态度． 相似文献
28.
29.
30.
Google为用户提供了多种检索功能,但这些检索功能的性能如何却少见于相关文献中。作者对Google的两种较为独特的检索功能进行了评析,分别是相似检索和链接检索,并以普通检索作为评价的标准。本文采用了20个检索式和20个目标网页,对相似检索、链接检索和普通检索的检索性能差异性进行了评价。研究中主要利用单因素方差分析法和回归分析法。研究结果显示普通检索表现最好。研究成果能帮助用户对相似检索和链接检索有较为清晰的认识,并且可以了解Google在这两种检索功能上所表现出的不同的检索性能。 相似文献