Google Book Search and Metadata     

Julia T. Pope  Robert P. Holley 《Cataloging & classification quarterly》2013,51(1):1-13

This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata.  相似文献   

Collaborating with Information Technology: Implementing Web Search at the University of New Mexico     

S. Y. Zoe Chao  Rebecca Lubas 《Cataloging & classification quarterly》2013,51(1-3):251-264

The University of New Mexico (UNM) has used the Google Search Appliance (GSA) to provide search for the University's Web content. When the GSA license expired, the campus Information Technologies (IT) department and the University Libraries (UL) took the opportunity to collaborate on a re-launch of the service as a joint project. By collaborating closely with IT, the UL personnel gained insight and first-hand information on how to optimize the Libraries’ Web presence. Outcomes were positive, both in the resulting product and in building bridges between the work cultures.  相似文献   

Changes at Google Scholar: A Conversation with Anurag Acharya     

Barbara Quint 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):77-79

ABSTRACT

Provides new insights into the growth and development of Google Scholar, based on an interview with its designer, Anurag Acharya.  相似文献   

Using Google Scholar at the Reference Desk     

Karen Bronshteyn  Kathryn Tvaruzka 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):115-124

ABSTRACT

Google Scholar has multiple uses as a reference tool of last resort, including citation completion, an alternative when catalogs are down, and interdisciplinary metasearching and database suggestion. During the reference desk transaction, users can be taught effective Google Scholar search techniques such as advanced search functionality and the nuances of results' groupings. In addition, reference desk interactions with Google Scholar give insight for instructional workshops.  相似文献   

An Opportunity,Not a Crisis: How Google Is Changing the Individual and the Information Profession     

Kay Cahill 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):67-75

ABSTRACT

This article explores some of the key impacts that Google and new technologies such as Web 2.0 have had on the way people see information and information professionals and presents the argument that much of what is typically seen as negative about Google is, in fact, positive.  相似文献   

Skating on Thin Intermediation: Can Libraries Survive?     

James M. Donovan 《Legal Reference Services Quarterly》2013,32(2-3):95-116

ABSTRACT

Predictions about the end of libraries point to a real crisis, but assign the wrong cause. Libraries will not be displaced by technology like Google, but can be undermined by librarians’ own reactions to patron demand for Google-like experiences. Librarians can respond with a “weak model” that prioritizes the satisfaction of patrons, or a “strong model” that recognizes higher values rooted in the status of librarianship as a profession. Although recent trends favor the dominance of the weak model, only by embracing the strong model can librarians survive the challenges that threaten libraries.  相似文献   

Web-Scale Discovery in an Academic Health Sciences Library: Development and Implementation of the EBSCO Discovery Service     

JoLinda L. Thompson  Kathe S. Obrig  Laura E. Abate 《Medical reference services quarterly》2013,32(1):26-41

Funds made available at the close of the 2010–11 fiscal year allowed purchase of the EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS) for a year-long trial. The appeal of this web-scale discovery product that offers a Google-like interface to library resources was counter-balanced by concerns about quality of search results in an academic health science setting and the challenge of configuring an interface that serves the needs of a diverse group of library users. After initial configuration, usability testing with library users revealed the need for further work before general release. Of greatest concern were continuing issues with the relevance of items retrieved, appropriateness of system-supplied facet terms, and user difficulties with navigating the interface. EBSCO has worked with the library to better understand and identify problems and solutions. External roll-out to users occurred in June 2012.  相似文献   

From Google Print to Google Book Search: The Controversial Initiative and Its Impact on Other Remarkable Digitization Projects     

Robert J. Lackie MLIS 《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(1):35-53

Google's initiative to scan and add book content into its search engine has resulted in much praise and protest. Changing its digitization project's name from Google Print to Google Book Search and adding information to its site did not keep Google out of copyright court. However, publicity surrounding this project has spawned renewed interest in book digitization projects, with collaborative efforts quickly growing. This article will look at Book Search's history, highlight how it has been altered along with its name, and point out other interesting book digitization projects that Book Search has spawned or recently brought into the limelight, such as those associated with the Internet Archive.  相似文献   

Optimal Results: What Libraries Need to Know About Google and Search Engine Optimization     

Kay Cahill  Renee Chalut 《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(3):234-247

Search engine optimization, or the practice of designing a web site so that it rises to the top of the results page when users search for particular keywords or phrases, has become so prevalent on the modern web that it has a significant influence on Google search results. This article examines the techniques used by search engine optimization practitioners, the difference between “white hat” and “black hat” optimization tactics, and why it is important for library staff to understand these techniques and their impact on search engine results pages. It also looks at ways that library staff can help their users develop awareness of the factors that influence search results and how to better assess the quality and relevance of results listings.  相似文献   

基于新浪微博的图书馆学人意见领袖调查与分析     

孔繁超 《大学图书馆学报》2013,31(2):55-59

我国图书馆学人正使用微博发布着自己的学术观点,建立起新的学术交流和传播渠道.通过对新浪微博的调查分析,在甄别出我国图书馆学人的微博意见领袖之后,对他们的博文进行了内容分析,并探讨了我国图书馆学人微博学术交流的现状和不足,最后提出几点建议.  相似文献