对开展社会科学成果查新研究的探讨   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

许家梁刘彦庆  褚衍昌 《津图学刊》2004,(3):4-6,29

本文认为，国内现有的自然科学成果查新机构无法适应社会科学成果查新需要，建立全国性社科成果查新体系势在必行。为此，需要开展相关的社会科学成果查新研究。本文对开展社会科学成果查新研究的背景、意义、内容和方法进行了探讨。  相似文献   

010字段中多卷书价格著录技巧及常见错误分析     

聂延平 《图书馆学研究》2005,(12):68-69

多卷书价格的著录在CNMARC中是容易出现漏洞且各馆著录形式多样的一个字段。这对图书馆固定资产的统计造成了一定的误差。笔者根据实际工作中的经验，把多卷书著录01C字段易出现的几种情况进行了归纳分析。对如何规范著录010字段进行了探讨。  相似文献   

对517字段适用范围的探讨   总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4  

邓福泉 《图书馆杂志》2005,24(3):52-54,58

517字段是用来为除510—516字段所标识题名之外的其它题名制作检索点的字段。文章针对在当前机读目录中滥用517字段的现象，对该字段的适用范围进行了全面讨论。  相似文献   

期刊文献分布特征的分析     

何荣利  何萌 《图书情报工作》2005,49(2):109-111

以1999-2003年生物技术学科期刊文献分布曲线为依据,利用知识密度梯度graduR(n)的概念,对知识场中文献分布特征进行分析。结果表明,在任何一个学科的知识场中,集中区文献分布呈间断性变化,离散区文献分布呈连续性变化,从而构成期刊文献分布的基本特征。基于此,指出期刊文献分布特征研究是对文献分布规律的进一步描述。  相似文献   

高校图书馆人对农村图书馆问题的忧思   总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5  

王虹 《图书情报知识》2005,(6):46-48

对农村图书馆问题的研究,体现着时代的要求、学术研究的境界和中国图书馆事业发展的进程。高校关心农村图书馆建设,具有理论价值和实际意义,当前应重点关注农村图书馆的统计、管理和服务工作等机制。  相似文献   

Organizational Power and the Institutional Review Board     

Debbie S. Dougherty  Michael W. Kramer 《Journal of Applied Communication Research》2005,33(3):277-284

In this essay, we respond to the narratives and essays in this issue by examining organizational power issues related to researchers and institutional research boards (IRBs). Rather than taking a singular perspective on power, we use multiple perspectives and suggest that the cumulative analyses provide the best understanding of IRBs and organizational power.  相似文献   

共词分析聚合研究领域的表面效度研究:基于自然语言处理     

周文杰  张彤彤  高冲 《高校图书馆工作》2018,(2):12-16

为考察共词分析在研究领域聚合中的有效性,本研究以1988年～2017年三十年间发表且收录于WoS(Web of Science)数据库的计算机科学、地理学、数学、应用化学和应用物理学等五个学科的标题、摘要和关键词为分析对象,对不同分析单元下所聚合的研究领域的表面效度进行了检验。研究发现,关键词在研究领域聚合中具有相对最高的表面效度,摘要和题名的效度则相对较低。然而,本研究也发现,科学计量领域现有聚类指标和工具所聚合的研究领域缺乏区分能力且各种指标均存在着一定的效度风险。本研究的发现对于丰富科学计量领域关于研究领域聚合有效性的认识具有重要理论意义。  相似文献   

Enhancing Research Impact in Heritage Conservation     

Theocharis Katrakazis  Cath Dillon  Petra Juvan  Stavroula Golfomitsou 《文物保护研究》2018,63(8):450-465

This paper examines how research impact is defined, measured, and generated – with a view to understanding how it can be enhanced within heritage conservation. It examines what is meant by ‘impact’ and how it can be promoted within heritage science through effective inter-disciplinary collaboration. Following a general examination of the current discourse concerning research impact, the study examined: (i) active research networks within heritage science; (ii) research planning and evaluation practices within heritage science; and (iii) the experiences of users (i.e. conservators and other heritage professionals) within research collaborations. Terminologies surrounding the notion of impact and the various phases of the research process were reviewed – from the initial identification of a knowledge gap to the eventual application of new findings in practice. Next, the reach and diversity of research collaborations (as identified through publication co-authorship) were studied to characterise the inter-disciplinary nature of heritage science and its connectedness to users. Findings showed substantial growth in international research collaborations over recent years, predominantly involving academic- and research-oriented institutions – although the engagement of heritage institutions has proportionally decreased. In addition, a worldwide survey of institutional planning and evaluation practices revealed a general reliance on processes driven by the interests of researchers – the systematic consideration of stakeholder opinion and evaluation of research outcomes being less common. Finally, a series of semi-structured interviews with senior heritage professionals explored their experience of collaborative research. The results identified key areas where strategic support is needed to promote user participation and enhance impact. These include training for research readiness, engagement, and impact for both researchers and users; better methods for needs and outcome assessment; affordable open access options and greater diversity of knowledge exchange opportunities. Finally, the need for ethical guidelines for responsible research, and greater emphasis on non-academic impact within research rating systems are discussed.  相似文献   

网络舆情场中信息受众观点测度的机理及路径分析     

宋先智  黄微  高俊峰 《图书情报工作》2018,62(2):100-107

[目的/意义]整合定性与定量的舆情研究视角,统一多模态研究对象,实现网络舆情信息受众的观点测度,可修复网络舆情分析与治理的理论与实践裂痕。[方法/过程]通过引入网络舆情场的概念,对网络舆情信息受众、受众观点测度的内涵进行诠释,就网络舆情场与信息受众观点测度的逻辑关系加以辩证讨论。[结果/结论]提出网络舆情场内舆情受众观点测度机理和具体测度路径,为后续网络舆情场中的网络舆情信息分析、多维度信息受众观点测度,受众认知规律发现,网络舆情监督和管控限制等层面的研究做相应铺垫。  相似文献   

The Changing Research Data Landscape and the Experiences of Ethics Review Board Chairs: Implications for Library Practice and Partnerships     

Brian Jackson 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2018,44(5):603-612

Academic libraries have to a large extent taken the lead in facilitating new approaches to research data management, but changes to the research data landscape have had an impact on numerous areas of academic work, including ethics review. Using interpretive phenomenological analysis of interviews with chairs of Canadian research ethics boards, this study explores how ethics review boards have experienced changes to data policy and related technologies in order to describe the ethical implications of new approaches to data management and to explore ways in which the library, ethics review boards, and other campus partners might harmonize efforts to support emerging data practices. While ethics review boards in Canada are keenly aware of open data policies, data publishing in practice is still nascent. There is uncertainty about the adoption of changing technologies for research and their impacts on privacy protection. Where responsibility lies for addressing these uncertainties is often unclear. Academic libraries and research ethics boards are well-suited to engage in mutual knowledge transfer and to integrate data management planning and ethics review processes. Institutional-level oversight that includes all campus departments impacted by changes to the research data landscape may facilitate improved communication and reduce role ambiguity.  相似文献