高校期末课程考试作弊问题的博弈论分析     

程香丽  张福磊 《德州学院学报》2014,30(5):89-94

根据博弈论,考生之间的囚徒困境博弈使得考生尤其是绩优生陷入"不作弊即吃亏"的心理怪圈,混合策略的监考博弈与处理作弊行为的动态博弈揭示了影响考生作弊行为及监考教师处理作弊行为的主要因素。基于此,应对考生加强诚信教育,进行诚信激励;应对监考老师进行监考激励,减小其秉公处理作弊行为的机会成本,鼓励其树立良好的职业声誉。  相似文献   

评考试舞弊问题     

刘正发 《民族教育研究》2002,13(2):65-69

各种各样的考试中共同存在的考试舞弊问题，产生了极大的负面影响，不能把它简单看成是一般的学生违纪行为。必须进一步加强考试管理，公开，公平地选拔或认定每一位考生，为国家提高高水平，高素质的社会主义建设人才。  相似文献   

高校对大学生考试作弊行使自主处分权的法律审视     

袁纪玮 《煤炭高等教育》2007,25(2):115-118

高校处分权是大学管理学生的重要权能之一。由于我国立法的相对滞后,近年来不断发生的学生诉高校不当处分案,引发出诸多问题,尤其是在学生考试作弊中的受教育权问题容易受到高校不当处分的侵犯,矛盾越来越突出。从高校处分权和学生受教育权入手,以大学生考试作弊为视角,通过对高校处分权的性质和对大学生考试作弊而受到开除学籍处分的法理分析,提出相应的解决对策,使高校处分权纳入法治化轨道,以此保障高校学生的合法权益。  相似文献   

大学生考试作弊的客观原因及对策   总被引：12，自引：0，他引：12  

魏小强  鲁井兰 《高校教育管理》2007,1(1):68-72

导致大学生考试作弊的原因有主观和客观两个方面,其中客观原因是导致考试作弊非常重要但却往往被人们忽视的方面,其主要体现为不合理的课程设置和激励机制、教学评价的局限性、不良的社会因素和社会压力以及考试法律制度的不健全等方面.针对这些客观原因,相应的对策应当是优化课程体制,还学习自主权给学生;建立多元的激励系统,改善对学生的激励机制;完善教学评价体系,健全考试机制;抵制社会不良风气,减轻学生的社会压力;完善考试的相关法律制度,依法治考.  相似文献   

大学生考试作弊的多视角探因与对策   总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5  

王健 《高校教育管理》2007,1(4):74-77

大学生考试作弊是当前高校亟待解决的突出问题之一,造成当前大学生作弊的原因有社会和学校的因素,也有家庭和个人的因素.要从根本上有效遏制大学生的作弊行为,有赖于学校、社会与家庭的共同努力.学校作为教育主体,应切实承担起自己的责任并履行自己的职能;政府应发挥主导作用,加强法制建设,净化社会风气,营造学校优良校风形成的良好外部环境;家庭教育则应突出品德教育,为孩子的人格发展营造和谐的家庭育人氛围.  相似文献   

The Efficacy of Policy Statements on Plagiarism: Do They Change Students' Views?   总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3  

Brown  Verity J.  Howell  Mark E. 《Research in higher education》2001,42(1):103-118

Concern about academic dishonesty has led to studies designed to explore its nature, prevalence, and causes. Nevertheless, to date there has been little empirical work designed to test the efficacy of measures to reduce cheating behavior. Many authors agree that there should be institutional statements about academic dishonesty that give definitions and state the penalties for cheating. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of such statements in terms of their influence on perceived severity and perceived incidence of plagiarism in undergraduates. We found that having the students read a carefully worded statement about plagiarism was an effective way to change the perceptions of how seriously plagiarism breaches academic guidelines. Our data further suggest that providing guidance about avoiding plagiarism that encourages students to take a more serious view of the issue is likely to have positive effects on future behavior.  相似文献   

大学生考试作弊的经济学分析   总被引：6，自引：1，他引：6  

郝玉柱 《山西财经大学学报(高等教育版)》2003,(4):74-76

章主要对大学生在校学习期间考试作弊的一般原因和具体原因进行了分析，提出了治理考试作弊的若干对策。  相似文献   

信用证结算的欺诈风险及防范     

侯德文 《湖北广播电视大学学报》2007,27(4):83-84

近年来利用信用证结算进行欺诈的案件越来越多,严重干扰了正常的国际贸易秩序。相对于其他欺诈方式,这类欺诈更具隐蔽性和复杂性,加之人们疏于防范,因而危害极大。本文从信用证欺诈产生的原因入手,分析了买卖双方在信用证结算中常见的欺诈表现形式,并据此提出了相应的对策和建议。  相似文献   

Can software improve marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating? A pilot study of the Turnitin authorship investigate alpha     

Phillip Dawson  Wendy Sutherland-Smith  Mark Ricksen 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2020,45(4):473-482

Abstract

Contract cheating happens when students outsource their assessed work to a third party. One approach that has been suggested for improving contract cheating detection is comparing students’ assignment submissions with their previous work, the rationale being that changes in style may indicate a piece of work has been written by somebody else. This approach is time consuming, but recent advances in machine learning and natural language processing suggest that it may be well suited to computerization. We trialed an early alpha version of Turnitin’s Authorship Investigate tool, which compares students’ submissions against their previous work. Twenty-four experienced markers from five units of study were asked to make decisions about the presence of contract cheating in bundles of 20 student assignments, which included 14 legitimate assignments and six purchased from contract cheating sites. We asked markers to determine if each assignment was contract cheating, then provided them with an Authorship Investigate report and let them change their decision. Marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating increased significantly, from 48% to 59% after using the report, with no significant difference in false positives. These findings suggest that software may be an effective component of institutional strategies to address contract cheating.  相似文献   

基于复合选择题的雷同答卷甄别探析——以某资格考试为例     

孔祥  常颖昊 《中国考试》2021,(2)

基于某资格类考试考后数据,对包含单选题和多选题的复合选择题的雷同答卷进行分析,提出单选甄别、多选甄别和合并甄别3种甄别方案,设计不同测验长度、难度、被抄袭考生水平、题目抄袭比率、作弊考生比率及显著性水平的实验样本。研究结果显示:合并甄别和单选甄别都表现出较好的甄别性能,多选甄别由于多选题数量方面的劣势,甄别率低且Ⅰ型错误率高。据此,提出甄别雷同答卷的建议:如果对甄别出的雷同答卷考生进行违纪违规处理,可将单选甄别和合并甄别分别甄别出的结果取交集作为最后处理依据;如果不对甄别结果进行处理,可将2种方案分别甄别出的结果取并集,以此来对考区或考点的考风考纪进行监管。  相似文献