首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   8篇
  免费   2篇
  国内免费   2篇
教育   2篇
科学研究   7篇
信息传播   3篇
  2022年   1篇
  2020年   1篇
  2019年   4篇
  2017年   1篇
  2015年   1篇
  2011年   1篇
  2010年   1篇
  2008年   1篇
  2002年   1篇
排序方式: 共有12条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Online book reviews reflect readers’ attitudes and opinions and serve as a data source for book impact assessment. Most research has only focused on the number of ratings and reviews to assess the impact of books. However, it is necessary to more thoroughly explore online book reviews, to analyze the viewpoints and sentiments expressed in them and the identity and motivation of the reviewers in order to evaluate the value of different types of book reviews. In this study, we collect Goodreads reviews of books indexed by the Book Citation Index and consider them according to the following three aspects: the popularity of highly cited books in Goodreads, the influence of reviewer roles (of author, librarian, and ordinary user) on book reviews, and the emotions and opinions behind reviewers’ ratings. Results consider the number of books reviewed in different disciplines, the variations in ratings of highly cited and non-highly cited books, differences in book reviews given by the reviewer roles, and the way reviewers express their sentiments about the books. The study concludes that if online reviews are to be used as indicators of book impact assessment, key considerations should include the subject discipline, the reviewer's role, and the sentiment polarity.  相似文献   
2.
防范学术不端论文出版的立体策略   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
【目的】 为了更有效地防范学术不端论文的出版,提出防范学术不端行为的立体策略。【方法】 利用逻辑推理法、举例法及综合分析法,分析学术期刊中存在的学术不端行为,从作者、责任编辑、审稿专家、主编四个维度分析不端文献出版的原因。【结果】 构建了立体防范学术不端论文出版的策略:初审前把关作者提供的基本信息;审稿时严格把关学术不端行为;加强主编监督机制;出版后建立问责制度;重视总结经验教训。【结论】 立体防范策略能够更全面地防范学术不端论文的出版。  相似文献   
3.
本文分析了高校学报审稿工作的现状,明确了各环节的审稿主体及其主要职责,提出了选择审稿人的原则和审稿工作应采取的措施。  相似文献   
4.
Reviewer Assignment Problem (RAP) is a crucial problem for the conference due to time constraints and inadequate availability of expert reviewers. A fair evaluation of paper is key to an author's success, paper quality, conference reputation, and productive usage of funds. Recent studies reflect on the issue of reviewer bias in bids favoring authors belonging to the top institution and higher authority. Existing Conference Management Systems (CMS) are solely dependent upon self-declared Conflict of Interest (CoI) made by the authors, and reviewers. In literature, existing studies considers topic similarity, potential CoI, and reviewer's workload as trivial factors for ensuring review quality. Other factors include the diversity and authority of a reviewer. Past studies propose several theoretical optimization models. In this paper, we first individually model the factors using the best possible strategy in a constrained-based optimization framework. We tried to propose a completely novel framework that can be practically implemented to improve upon the performance of existing CMS. We map the RAP to an equilibrium multi-job assignment problem. Moreover, we propose a meta-heuristic greedy solution to solve it using weighted matrix factorization. We re-define an assignment quality metric required to validate such assignments. A real conference assignment data set collected from EasyChair is used for a comparative study. The TPMS is used as a baseline because it also uses similar factors, and due to its integration with widely used Microsoft CMS. The results show that the mean assignment quality of the proposed method is superior to other benchmark RAP systems.  相似文献   
5.
著名报人王韬一生做了三件大事:上书太平军,游历英法,主持《循环日报》——一张中国人自办成功的最早中文日报。他是其报言论的灵魂,风行一时。王韬形成了自己的办报理论与新闻思想,是中国近代报刊思想的奠基人。  相似文献   
6.
同行评议专家工作业绩测评及其模型研究   总被引:9,自引:2,他引:7  
郑称德 《科研管理》2002,23(2):41-45
本文在对国家自然科学基金同行评议运行状况分析的基础上,介绍了同行评议工作业绩评估对于项目评议的重要性及其研究现状,初步给出了基于项目评议结果的同行评议工作测评指标和模型,并对其存在的不足以及下一步的研究内容进行了分析。  相似文献   
7.
Reviewer assignment is an important task in many research-related activities, such as conference organization and grant-proposal adjudication. The goal is to assign each submitted artifact to a set of reviewers who can thoroughly evaluate all aspects of the artifact’s content, while, at the same time, balancing the workload of the reviewers. In this paper, we focus on textual artifacts such as conference papers, where both (aspects of) the submitted papers and (expertise areas of) the reviewers can be described with terms and/or topics extracted from the text. We propose a method for automatically assigning a team of reviewers to each submitted paper, based on the clusters of the reviewers’ publications as latent research areas. Our method extends the definition of the relevance score between reviewers and papers using the latent research areas information to find a team of reviewers for each paper, such that each individual reviewer and the team as a whole cover as many paper aspects as possible. To solve the constrained problem where each reviewer has a limited reviewing capacity, we utilize a greedy algorithm that starts with a group of reviewers for each paper and iteratively evolves it to improve the coverage of the papers’ topics by the reviewers’ expertise. We experimentally demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches w.r.t several standard quality measures.  相似文献   
8.
目的】提出一种切实可行的外审专家信息更新方法,解决稿件送审困难的问题。【方法】 通过分析编委对期刊提出的意见,确定外审专家信息缺失是影响编委送审的主要问题,得出外审专家信息维护的必要性。通过对获取编委信息渠道的讨论及对微软办公软件的研究,提出外审专家信息更新维护的方法。将提出方法用到2013-2014年为IJAC审理过稿件的外审专家数据库上。【结果】为了评估提出方法的性能,定义了信息缺失率和期刊退回率。数据表明,通过提出的信息更新方法,外审专家的信息缺失率为9.14%,即90.86% 的外审专家信息不缺失。IJAC为这90.86% 的外审专家寄送样刊,期刊的退回率仅为0.99%。可以看出,提出的外审专家信息更新方法可以极大地提高外审专家信息的全面性和准确性。【结论】 面对外审专家信息缺失的难题,提出的方法可以有效地解决由于信息缺失导致的稿件送审难题,进而促进期刊稿件质量的提升和编辑部的长远发展。  相似文献   
9.
科技期刊稿件外审应注意的若干问题   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
刘宇 《出版科学》2011,19(3):30-33
根据实际情况和审稿经验,从专家库的建立和管理、外审过程管理及稿件审回处理三个方面,总结分析科技期刊稿件外审中应该注意的若干问题。强调外审环节的重要性,明确编辑部在外审中应该担负的责任和注意事项。  相似文献   
10.
Assigning paper to suitable reviewers is of great significance to ensure the accuracy and fairness of peer review results. In the past three decades, many researchers have made a wealth of achievements on the reviewer assignment problem (RAP). In this survey, we provide a comprehensive review of the primary research achievements on reviewer assignment algorithm from 1992 to 2022. Specially, this survey first discusses the background and necessity of automatic reviewer assignment, and then systematically summarize the existing research work from three aspects, i.e., construction of candidate reviewer database, computation of matching degree between reviewers and papers, and reviewer assignment optimization algorithm, with objective comments on the advantages and disadvantages of the current algorithms. Afterwards, the evaluation metrics and datasets of reviewer assignment algorithm are summarized. To conclude, we prospect the potential research directions of RAP. Since there are few comprehensive survey papers on reviewer assignment algorithm in the past ten years, this survey can serve as a valuable reference for the related researchers and peer review organizers.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号