试析联结主义早期研究者的研究   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

贾林祥 《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》2003,2(6):84-87,94

联结主义是20世纪80年代早期所复兴的认知心理学的一种新的研究范式，早期研究者的代表有Mc-culloch、Pitts和Hebb等，介绍和分析他们关于心灵及其特征、形式神经元及其特征、知觉的有关思想以及一些具体的研究和局限性，对当代联结主义的研究有很大的启示作用。  相似文献   

日本国际化研究人才培养策略——以东京农工大学推进“国际化研究人才培育项目”为例          下载免费PDF全文

秦东兴 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》2021,(5):104-111

进入21世纪以后,日本的高校面对国际竞争出现种种困境。其中,学者的国际流动性差、研究成果的国际影响力低以及研究创新性不足的状况迫使日本政府和高校采取了各种措施,2014年推出“国际化研究人才培育项目”即是其中之一。该项目力图通过促进日本与海外的高校或研究机构间进行学者互派与交流,进而开展合作研究并发表相关研究成果,从而培养日本的年轻研究者使其达到世界顶尖水平,提升大学和国家的科研竞争力。以东京农工大学为例,实施该项目以后,在学者的国际交流、合作研究成果的发表以及开拓国际尖端研究等方面取得了一定成效,促进了年轻研究者的成长。但该项目也存在其局限性和不足,对我国有较好的启示意义。  相似文献   

科研经费的有效使用特征及其影响因素——基于扎根理论   总被引：7，自引：1，他引：7       下载免费PDF全文

李燕萍  郭玮  黄霞 《科学学研究》2009,27(11):1685-1691

随着我国科技创新战略和创新型国家建设战略的深入实施,提高科研经费的使用效率成为促进我国科技发展的关键。本文运用扎根理论,从我国科研经费管理和科研工作者的角度,通过对文献探讨和深度访谈获得的资料进行分析,明晰了科研经费有效使用的特征,识别了影响科研工作者有效使用科研经费的因素,从环境因素、科研工作者、科研经费投入与产出等方面构建了影响科研经费有效使用的"四因素"立体模型,提出了以科研经费制度、科研经费管理、科研成果评价、科研工作者学术责任等为核心的科研经费有效使用管理模式,对促进我国科研经费使用效率的提高具有重要的现实意义。  相似文献   

论教育史学的想象力     

王晓慧 《教育学术月刊》2011,(9):11-13,34

教育史学的想象力是一种教育史研究者所应具备的心智品质,它帮助处于当代教育场域中的研究者带着现实教育问题回到过去,并在理解过去教育的基础上研究与重构教育史,从而厘清与引领当代的教育改革。教育史学的想象力不仅能够帮助我们完成知识生产,而且能使教育史研究立足当下、重塑过往与走向实践。  相似文献   

2000-2010年国内期刊中的客家研究论文分析     

陈瑜林 《嘉应学院学报》2011,29(9):12-16

新世纪以来,随着客家研究理论和方法的创新,客家研究取得了巨大的发展。期刊论文是科研成果的主要呈现方式之一,通过论文年度发表数量、论文的期刊分布、作者分布、作者单位分布、高频关键词、文献被引次数6个方面对2000-2010年客家研究论文进行分析,可以了解目前客家研究的状况:总体发展势头良好、建立了较好的科研成果发表平台、拥有了一批高素质学者队伍、形成了一些较好的学术团队、研究内容丰富、科研成果学术价值还需进一步提升。  相似文献   

Activating the curriculum: a socio-ecological action research frame for health and physical education     

Justen O'Connor  Laura Alfrey 《Sport, Education and Society》2015,20(6):691-709

The health and physical education (HPE) profession needs to find alternatives to its individualistic and performative focus if it is to remain relevant and meaningful for all learners. This paper presents a way of framing HPE that helps to shift the focus from the individual as autonomous decision-maker, and goes beyond sport and fitness testing as the main contexts for learning. To do this we present the socio-ecological action research (SEAR) frame for unit development that was co-created and enacted over a six-month period involving dialogue between teachers, students, parents, researchers and community. This paper presents findings from semi-structured interviews, student artefacts and field notes collected as one component of a broader three-phase study which spanned three years. The data describe how generalist primary teachers (n=4) from a small Victorian community and their students (aged 8–10 years) tackled a unit of work that positioned centrally the everyday physical experiences of active school travel (AST). Teachers supported students in exploring barriers to their AST, and developing strategies that would counteract some of the negative perceptions that had limited their AST in the past. The findings suggest that the unit of work evolved from an exploration of AST into a much broader exploration of the whole community. This paper does not provide evidence for an alternative way to view HPE, rather it represents an embryonic exploration of how a SEAR frame might support teachers in applying inquiry-based pedagogies that extend beyond the individual as autonomous decision-maker, and promote opportunities for exploration and understanding of environmental, social and personal factors that influence our health and everyday physically active lives. Despite students being positioned as central actors within the SEAR frame, obtaining genuine student voice throughout the process proved challenging.  相似文献   

制度作用下大学科研人员产学合作模式选择的扎根研究     

张慧颖  连晓庆 《科学学与科学技术管理》2015,(3):163-171

通过对大学科研人员的深入访谈,运用扎根理论的研究方法,探索性地构建了对大学科研人员产学合作模式选择产生影响的直接制度和间接制度;研究发现,直接制度在大学科研人员的产学活动中发挥的效应为零,与直接制度相比,间接制度对大学科研人员产学活动的影响更为明显。结果表明政策制定者需要进一步疏通政策的传导机制,强化政策的执行力,进而提高大学科研人员产学合作的积极性。  相似文献   

Researching up and across in physical education and sport pedagogy: methodological lessons learned from an intergenerational narrative inquiry     

Steven B. Rynne  Eimear Enright  Laura Alfrey 《Sport, Education and Society》2017,22(1):140-156

Of issue in this paper are the ways in which different forms of narrative may be of value in undertaking research in potentially thorny situations. The project that inspired this paper saw 30 Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy (PESP) Early Career Academics (ECAs) from more than 20 universities across Australasia, North America and Europe, provide narrative accounts of their ongoing academic experiences. From these stories, three letters seeking advice and guidance from leaders in the field were constructed. Following further feedback from the ECAs, the 3 letters were sent to 11 professors in the PESP field with a request to respond, also in letter form. The composite letters and the professorial responses were then the subject of a symposium at an international PESP conference. While the larger project engages with questions of being and becoming an academic in the neoliberal university, this paper is primarily concerned with methodological issues, including our steps and missteps with narrative, inquiry and the field. More specifically, the focus is on narrative as both the method and phenomena of study. As such, we consider issues associated with using dialogue as data, the provocation of participants, as well as both the presentation and representation of data and the relative power of the participants. In doing so, we critically engage with issues of anonymity (or lack thereof), the practice of ‘researching up’ and finally reach the conclusion that the careful approach to data generation, treatment and presentation necessitated by this project, should be a more regular feature of all qualitative inquiry.  相似文献   

试析档案学术研究主体的评价途径   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

白桂芝 《档案学通讯》2011,(4):4-7

档案学术研究主体是中国档案学术研究的支柱,是决定档案学术研究成果科学性的核心力量。目前我国对学科进行评价的通用标准是以学术计量的方式,从客观的角度去评价一门学科的优劣性,而忽视了科研成果背后的学术研究主体的决定性作用。因此本文将从档案学术研究主体评价的角度出发,从"外部证实"和"内部完备"两个层面阐释档案学书研究主体评价的基本途径。  相似文献   

大学高级研究人员激励因素模型实证研究     

程文  张国梁  董玲玲 《科技与管理》2010,12(2):133-136

在文献综述、网络信息资源分析以及专家访谈基础上,提出大学高级研究人员激励因素,并对大学高级研究人员激励因素量表进行开发与实证研究。研究表明,大学高级研究人员激励因素模型包括内在激励和外在激励两个维度,由成长激励、价值激励、认同激励、保障激励、工作激励和环境激励6个因素构成。  相似文献