排序方式： 共有3条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
张杨 《河北体育学院学报》2018,32(3):12-18
处罚效力问题影响到中国足球事业的长远健康发展。运用文献资料法和案例分析法对中国足球协会纪律处罚的现状进行分析。在对运动员、教练员和官员、俱乐部、赛区及其他主体的处罚进行统计分析及与国外情况对比的基础上,指出,中国足协的纪律处罚存在未能罚当其罪,规则制定不严谨,执法不公平,重处罚、轻教育,责任主体错位,救济途径不完善、不规范等问题。为提高中足协的处罚效力及效果,提出对违规违纪行为采取量化管理;对球场暴力采取思想教育、行为控制、严肃处理三管齐下;加大惩治力度,重视教育手段;建立独立的体育仲裁制度等方面的建议,旨在为我国足球事业的可持续发展提供借鉴。 相似文献
2.
管华 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2021,(1):26-39
教育行政机关是最重要的教育行政法律关系主体,其法律地位学界研究较少。教育行政机关是在教育领域行使权力的国家行政机关,既包括各级政府,也包括教育行政部门和其他主管部门。通过梳理12部法律、19部行政法规、48部行政规章发现,教育行政机关具有以下职权:教育行政立法权或规定权、教育行政许可权、教育行政处罚权、教育行政处分权、教育行政给付权、教育行政指导监督权和其他权力。教育行政机关与民办学校存在许可、处罚和监督等外部关系,与公办学校以处分、预算、人事等内部关系为主。教育行政机关与教师、学生直接发生法律关系情形较少。 相似文献
3.
Drew P. Cingel 《The Communication Review》2018,21(2):131-152
Although research has examined demographic predictors of the presence of technology rules during childhood, results are mixed, and no known research has considered whether the presence of and reasons for technology rules might relate to individuals’ future academic achievement. We used survey data collected from a diverse sample of 1,115 college students. Although the total number of reasons for childhood technology rules did not relate to college grades, results suggested that having at least one reason for having a technology rule, as well as having a rule restricting technology use because it cut into homework time, related negatively to young adults’ college grades. Thus, reasons for parent rules about technology use do not positively relate to their children’s academic achievement, and in some cases are negatively related. These findings have theoretical importance for understanding how perceptions of childhood rules, and the reasons for those rules, relate to individuals’ academic performance during college. 相似文献
1