排序方式： 共有43条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
在线电子资源使用统计的新标准——COUNTER 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
随着电子资源的迅猛发展，在线电子资源使用统计新标准——COUNTER已经被国外很多出版商所采用。本文介绍了COUNTER最新版本的体系结构，并结合我馆电子资源的使用报告，分析COUMTER使用统计报告的具体体现形式和作用。 相似文献
2.
科学数据使用统计是科学数据使用计量的重要构成，是科研学术评价的重要参考依据。对比三类数据使用计量的效果及应用难度，文章认为使用统计计量有良好的可信度和可操作性。在梳理研究现状基础上，文章分析数据使用统计的利益相关方，结合数据自身特点，总结流程，并重点阐述数据收集、规范、清洗、报告等关键流程问题，最后提出思考与建议。 相似文献
3.
SUSHI是标准化使用统计获取协议,可促成使用统计数据格式的一致性,实现数据获取和管理过程的自动化。在推动电子资源规范化管理的宏观背景下,对SUSHI的广泛遵从对于推进图书馆联盟电子资源集团采购统计评估工作规范化,带动国内图书馆ERMS的研发和实施,促进基于电子资源生命周期管理流程的规范化,加速电子资源使用统计标准化进程具有深远影响。图书馆和数据库商应积极响应,共同促进电子资源使用统计自动获取和规范管理。 相似文献
4.
COUNTER是规范网络化电子资源使用统计报告数据处理、审核和提交的国际化标准,是图书馆电子资源使用量统计和评估的核心要素。目前COUNTER已经发布了最新版本R5,了解R5的新特性及与之前版本的不同对于图书馆的电子资源统计工作具有重要意义。本文拟从COUNTERR5的报告设置、报告的指标类型、数据类型、访问类型和其他完善报告的属性来解析R5,同时介绍R5对SUSHI收割的影响、"持续维护"的概念、R5发布对图书馆的影响和R5实施的重要时间节点,同时也对R5较之R4的发展和不同进行了比较和分析。COUNTERR5的主要关注点是一致性、清晰性和简单性,较之COUNTERR4有了明显的完善,同时包含了持续的维护过程,允许对代码进行更新而不必再引入一个全新的版本,解决了版本升级会对供应商和图书馆带来的各种时间和人员成本的影响。 相似文献
5.
Oliver Pesch 《期刊图书馆员》2016,71(2):83-90
Since its first Code of Practice was published in 2003, setting the first international standard for reporting usage of scholarly content, Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) has been continually refining the code of practice to meet the evolving needs of its library, publisher, and vendor membership. The latest release of the Code of Practice went into effect in early 2014 and introduced several improvements over the prior releases. Work is now underway on Release 5 of the COUNTER Code of Practice with a promise that it will provide further improvements to better report on usage of scholarly information in an ever-changing discovery and access environment. This column discusses current challenges and how Release 5 might address them. 相似文献
6.
7.
Established in 2014, Usus (Latin for usage), supported by Counting Online Usage of NeTworked Electronic Resources (COUNTER), but editorially independent, is a community-run website designed to provide a space for librarians, consortia, publishers, aggregators, repository managers, and scholars to discuss all aspects of usage, including particular ways that use is measured. In this session, Usus Supervisory Board members provided an introduction to Usus, outlined the purpose of the community-run site, and discussed how librarians may utilize the site to submit ongoing and complex usage issues. In addition, the presenters engaged attendees in discussing specific e-resource usage issues they have encountered as well as report changes and additions in the recently released COUNTER Code of Practice 4. 相似文献
8.
电子资源使用统计及其应用初探 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
越来越多的供应商开始提供符合COUNTER规范的电子资源使用统计报告,使得图书馆能够方便地获得来自不同供应商的遵循相同规范的使用统计。这就为图书馆在电子资源的馆藏评估、采访策略的调整及相关服务的改进等诸多方面工作提供了客观的、可靠的数据,从而可以进一步提高电子资源的管理水平。 相似文献
9.
Oliver Pesch 《期刊图书馆员》2017,73(3-4):195-207
A new release of the COUNTER Code of Practice, Release 5 (R5), was recently published and becomes the standard that publishers and content providers must comply with when they deliver the January 2019 usage data to their customers. This article provides an overview of what’s new in R5, draws some comparisons to the previous code of practice, and discusses the implications for librarians. 相似文献
10.
Internet Protocol (IP) technology has played an important role in the management of access to scholarly work within institutions since the advent of electronic publishing in the late 1990s. Despite recent efforts to explore alternative modes of authentication, the ubiquitous use of IP address authentication within the systems of libraries, publishers, and third party vendors around the world suggests it will continue to play a significant role for the foreseeable future. However, recent studies show that a large amount of the IP address data held within publisher systems is incorrect, improperly assigned, or requires clarification. Poor source data carries significant risks—not the least of which translates into unreliable usage reporting for libraries and publishers. The IP Registry is designed to help mitigate these challenges by creating a Registry of cleaned data that libraries and publishers can interact with in a centralized fashion thereby helping to ensure accuracy and reducing the level of resources necessary to manage and communicate changes to existing data. The database of more than 60,000 academic, corporate, and government libraries was created through the amalgamation of raw source data from more than 170 scholarly publishers. In addition to cleaned IP address data, the Registry includes standardized English naming, aliases, local language naming (and characters), hierarchies, and organizational IDs for each record. The importance of accurately understanding current usage and how libraries utilize published content is clear. Regardless of what the future holds, the need for a clean and stable source of IP address data is real for libraries, publishers, and vendors alike. 相似文献