首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   67篇
  免费   3篇
教育   37篇
体育   4篇
信息传播   29篇
  2020年   2篇
  2017年   2篇
  2016年   2篇
  2013年   6篇
  2011年   2篇
  2010年   2篇
  2009年   1篇
  2007年   1篇
  2003年   3篇
  2002年   1篇
  1997年   3篇
  1996年   2篇
  1995年   2篇
  1993年   1篇
  1992年   4篇
  1991年   4篇
  1990年   4篇
  1989年   3篇
  1988年   3篇
  1987年   2篇
  1986年   3篇
  1985年   3篇
  1984年   2篇
  1983年   2篇
  1982年   1篇
  1979年   1篇
  1978年   1篇
  1977年   1篇
  1976年   1篇
  1975年   1篇
  1972年   1篇
  1971年   1篇
  1970年   2篇
排序方式: 共有70条查询结果,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
2.
Educational Assessment: reply to Andrew Davis   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
Assessment is at the heart of teaching as it provides a necessary condition for judging success or failure. It is also necessary to ensure that providers of education are accountable to users and providers of resources. Inferential hazard is an inescapable part of any assessment procedure but cannot be an argument against assessment as such. Rich knowledge may be the aim of education but it does not follow that it is the aim of every stage of education. Teaching to tests is the most natural way of ensuring that teaching matches assessment. Failure to assess places public education in jeopardy.  相似文献   
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The orthodox view on higher education financing is that students should bear some of the costs of attending and, where necessary, meet that cost through debt financing. New economic realties, including protracted economic slowdown and increasing austerity of the state with respect to the public funding of goods and services has meant that the same generation who have to borrow the most in order to attend face significantly fewer employment prospects upon graduation. In this context, is the current approach of shifting the costs of post‐secondary education from the general public to individual students justified? Most debate on the issue has focused on the demands of distributive justice within the modern higher education system and on the whole accepts the idea that students ought to pay. I argue that distributive arguments alone are insufficient because they tacitly endorse the provision of higher education as being much like a consumer's choice. As an alternative, I explore the place and importance of higher education in supporting personal autonomy as a central liberal democratic value. I then argue that debt financing of higher education places unreasonable constraints on student's choices with respect to the kind of democratic citizens that they would otherwise aspire to be. This constraint has negative implications for the wellbeing of individual students and the larger society.  相似文献   
10.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号