排序方式： 共有18条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Constantinos M. Kokkinos Ioanna Voulgaridou Marianna Mandrali Chrysoula Parousidou 《Psychology in the schools》2016,53(3):253-269
The aim of this study was to investigate possible interactive links between theory of mind (ToM), moral disengagement and relational aggression, using a moderated mediation analysis, with gender as a moderator, in a sample of 120 Greek preadolescents. Results indicated that relational aggression was significantly positively associated with moral disengagement and negatively with ToM. Moderated mediation analyses indicated that boys with deficient ToM were more likely to morally disengage from their actions which in turn resulted in relational aggression, while poor ToM was directly linked to relational aggression only for preadolescent girls. Moral disengagement had a direct effect on relational aggression only for boys, while ToM was found to partially mediate the relationship between moral disengagement and relational aggression only for girls. The results emphasize that the co‐morbid effects of socio‐cognitive factors should be taken into consideration when relational aggression is explored. 相似文献
2.
Besiki Stvilia Charles C. Hinnant Shuheng Wu Adam Worrall Dong Joon Lee Kathleen Burnett Gary Burnett Michelle M. Kazmer Paul F. Marty 《Library & information science research》2017,39(2):85-97
This study examined factors that might affect researchers' willingness to collaborate with a specific researcher and the priorities given to those factors. In addition, it investigated how researchers determined the ownership of collaborative project data and how they determined the order of authorship on collaborative publications in condensed matter physics. In general, researchers rated their intrinsic motivations the highest, such as the quality of ideas a potential collaborator might have and their satisfaction with a past collaboration, followed by their extrinsic motivations, such as the complementary knowledge, skills, or resources the collaborator could provide. In addition, researchers who had a greater number of collaborative projects and researchers who had served as a project PI or co-PI valued the deep-level, personality-related characteristics of a collaborator higher than did those who had not. Younger researchers were more risk averse and more concerned with a collaborator's reputation and the possible cost of a collaboration decision. Additionally, younger researchers indicated more often than older researchers that they did not know whether their project teams followed any rules or norms or engaged in negotiation to determine the order of authorship on collaborative publications. 相似文献
3.
Malogianni Chrysoula Luo Tian Stefaniak Jill Eckhoff Angela 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2021,69(5):2353-2375
Educational technology research and development - Little is known about the role of prompts to help learners solve ill-structured learning problems. Instructors do not devote adequate time to... 相似文献
4.
The evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is widelyregarded as supplying the ‘gold standard’ in medicine—wemay sometimes have to settle for other forms of evidence, butthis is always epistemically second-best. But how well justifiedis the epistemic claim about the superiority of RCTs? This paperadds to my earlier (predominantly negative) analyses of theclaims produced in favour of the idea that randomization playsa uniquely privileged epistemic role, by closely inspectingthree related arguments from leading contributors to the burgeoningfield of probabilistic causality—Papineau, Cartwrightand Pearl. It concludes that none of these further argumentssupplies any practical reason for thinking of randomizationas having unique epistemic power.
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Why theissue is of great practical importance—the ECMOcase
- 3Papineau on the ‘virtues of randomization’
- 4 Cartwrighton causality and the ‘ideal’ randomizedexperiment
- 5 Pearl on randomization, nets and causes
- 6 Conclusion
- 2 Why theissue is of great practical importance—the ECMOcase
5.
6.
Facilitation in action research 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
7.
Science &; Education - 相似文献
8.
9.
John L. Worrall 《Journal of Criminal Justice Education》2015,26(4):507-529
Peer review is the bedrock of the scientific enterprise, yet it enjoys scant validation. The federal government’s CrimeSolutions.gov initiative provides a unique opportunity to address this limitation. As part of the initiative, trained experts evaluate criminal justice evaluation research on several of the same criteria editors use to make publication decisions. Data from a sample of articles published in Social Sciences Citation Index journals were obtained from the CrimeSolutions.gov database, then used to model publication quality, operationalized as the product of the journal’s five-year impact factor and article citations per year (an article-level measure). The model explained only five percent of the variation in publication quality, raising several questions about the validity of peer review in criminal justice evaluation research. 相似文献
10.
R S Worrall 《Journal of learning disabilities》1990,23(4):207-212
Quackery is currently a widespread problem that pervades all aspects of healthcare, including the treatment of learning disorders. A discussion of the nature of modern health fraud in special education is presented. The psychopathology of health fraud, the standards by which pseudoscience and health quackery are defined, and the complexities of learning disorders are discussed. A Therapy Rating Scale to determine if an alternative therapy is reasonable is presented. Several popular therapies are used as examples. 相似文献