Should American studies study itself?     

James E. Hartley 《Academic Questions》2004,17(2):33-44

  相似文献   

Peer choice – does reviewer self‐selection work?          下载免费PDF全文

James Hartley  John Cowan  Nick Rushby 《Learned Publishing》2016,29(1):27-29

The British Journal of Educational Technology (BJET) uses a novel system for obtaining referees by e‐mailing the abstracts of submissions to a panel of over 250 referees and allowing these individuals to choose which papers they would like to review. An analysis of 13 experienced referees showed that, of 473 reviews assessed, these referees were slightly more lenient than the editor and that electronic records provide useful data that can be mined in interesting ways.  相似文献   

A critical appraisal of Marie Clay's ‘Concepts About Print Test’     

David N. Hartley  Peter G. Quine 《Literacy》1982,16(2):109-112

  相似文献   

The psychologist as wordsmith: a questionnaire study of the writing strategies of productive British psychologists     

James Hartley  Alan Branthwaite 《Higher Education》1989,18(4):423-452

  相似文献   

Down with ‘op. cit.’     

James Hartley 《Learned Publishing》2005,18(1):75-77

  相似文献   

Current findings from research on structured abstracts.   总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5  

James Hartley 《Journal of the Medical Library Association》2004,92(3):368-371

BACKGROUND: Structured abstracts were introduced into medical research journals in the mid 1980s. Since then they have been widely used in this and other contexts. AIM: The aim of this paper is to summarize the main findings from research on structured abstracts and to discuss the limitations of some aspects of this research. METHOD: A narrative literature review of all of the relevant papers known to the author was conducted. RESULTS: Structured abstracts are typically longer than traditional ones, but they are also judged to be more informative and accessible. Authors and readers also judge them to be more useful than traditional abstracts. However, not all studies use "real-life" published examples from different authors in their work, and more work needs to be done in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: The findings generally support the notion that structured abstracts can be profitably introduced into research journals. Some arguments for this, however, have more research support than others.  相似文献   

Description of the delta of Danube,and of the works recently executed at the Sulina Mouth     

C.A. Hartley 《Journal of The Franklin Institute》1862,74(3):161-166

  相似文献   

Support for Students with Hidden Disabilities in Universities: A Case Study     

Donna Couzens  Shiralee Poed  Mika Kataoka  Alicia Brandon  Judy Hartley  Deb Keen 《International Journal of Disability, Development & Education》2015,62(1):24-41

More students with disabilities are accessing the tertiary sector with many disabilities not easily observed (or hidden), because there are no physical indicators. These “hidden” disabilities affect a variety of cognitive processes and may be developmental or acquired. To ensure students with hidden disabilities can enrol, engage in and benefit from tertiary education, universities generally provide a range of supports. Typically these supports and any reasonable adjustments are negotiated with students taking into account a number of factors including, where available, any supporting documentation that they might be able to provide. This case study reports efforts within one large Australian university to support higher education students with hidden disabilities on campus. Perceptions on the use of and barriers to support available were collected from seven undergraduate students who self-identified as having hidden disabilities and from eight support staff. Results indicated that students found their informal networks to be their most effective supports, closely followed by clear, caring and flexible lecturers and tutors. There were mixed positive and negative perceptions reported on the universal and disability-specific supports available. Implications and future research directions are discussed.  相似文献   

Oxford handbook of internet psychology – Edited by Adam Joinson     

James Hartley   《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2008,39(3):561-562

  相似文献   

参考文献体例的两种组织形式     

James Hartley 《中国科技期刊研究》2004,15(2):127-129

参考文献表的编排有多种体例形式，并且不同体例中参考文献各著录项的表达也不尽相同。由于期刊大都倾向于采用自己所特定的参考文献著录格式，因而目前已有的参考文献软件并不能给予作者很多帮助，即作者如果将其稿件由某期刊改投到另一种期刊，通常需要改动其中的参考文献表格式和正文中的相关部分。在众多的参考文献表格式中，有两种最为主要。其一是在人文科学中较为常用的哈佛体系(即著者一出版年体系)，该体系规定正文中给出引文的作者和出版年，文献书目中的引文按著者姓名的字母顺序和出版年的先后排列。另外一种主要的参考文献表是数字体系(顺序编码制)，即正文中给出引文的序号，参考文献表中的各篇文献按其在正文中出现的先后顺序排列。科技论文和医学论文多采用该种体例。本文列举了上述两种体例的格式，并对比了二者的优缺点，认为著者．出版年体系可以使学术论文的读者很方便地了解作者所引用的工作是由谁完成的，而数字体系(顺序编码制)因为简洁，从而可以使读者更为通畅地阅读论文。  相似文献