首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   120篇
  免费   1篇
教育   115篇
科学研究   3篇
信息传播   3篇
  2022年   1篇
  2021年   1篇
  2018年   7篇
  2017年   7篇
  2016年   9篇
  2015年   5篇
  2014年   8篇
  2013年   10篇
  2012年   7篇
  2011年   4篇
  2010年   10篇
  2009年   9篇
  2008年   7篇
  2007年   6篇
  2006年   3篇
  2005年   6篇
  2004年   4篇
  2003年   3篇
  2002年   1篇
  1999年   3篇
  1997年   2篇
  1996年   1篇
  1995年   1篇
  1992年   2篇
  1991年   1篇
  1984年   1篇
  1976年   1篇
  1970年   1篇
排序方式: 共有121条查询结果,搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Content‐based automated scoring has been applied in a variety of science domains. However, many prior applications involved simplified scoring rubrics without considering rubrics representing multiple levels of understanding. This study tested a concept‐based scoring tool for content‐based scoring, c‐rater?, for four science items with rubrics aiming to differentiate among multiple levels of understanding. The items showed moderate to good agreement with human scores. The findings suggest that automated scoring has the potential to score constructed‐response items with complex scoring rubrics, but in its current design cannot replace human raters. This article discusses sources of disagreement and factors that could potentially improve the accuracy of concept‐based automated scoring.  相似文献   
10.
Reforms such as technology-enhanced instruction require principal leadership. Yet, many principals report that they need help to guide implementation of science and technology reforms. We identify strategies for helping principals provide this leadership. A two-phase design is employed. In the first phase we elicit principals’ varied ideas about the Technology-enhanced Learning in Science (TELS) curriculum materials being implemented by teachers in their schools, and in the second phase we engage principals in a leadership workshop designed based on the ideas they generated. Analysis uses an emergent coding scheme to categorize principals’ ideas, and a knowledge integration framework to capture the development of these ideas. The analysis suggests that principals frame their thinking about the implementation of TELS in terms of: principal leadership, curriculum, educational policy, teacher learning, student outcomes and financial resources. They seek to improve their own knowledge to support this reform. The principals organize their ideas around individual school goals and current political issues. Principals prefer professional development activities that engage them in reviewing curricula and student work with other principals. Based on the analysis, this study offers guidelines for creating learning opportunities that enhance principals’ leadership abilities in technology and science reform.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号