排序方式： 共有6条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
2.
Krijnen Eke van Steensel Roel Meeuwisse Marieke Jongerling Joran Severiens Sabine 《Reading and writing》2020,33(1):207-238
Reading and Writing - Based on the Home Literacy Model, this study explored a refined model of home literacy activities and their relations with children’s emergent literacy skills in a... 相似文献
3.
Learning Environment, Interaction, Sense of Belonging and Study Success in Ethnically Diverse Student Groups 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Marieke Meeuwisse Sabine E. Severiens Marise Ph. Born 《Research in higher education》2010,51(6):528-545
The purpose of this paper was to investigate a model for describing the relationships between the extent to which learning
environments are activating and students’ interaction with teachers and peers, sense of belonging, and study success. It was
tested whether this model holds true for both ethnic minority students and ethnic majority students. A total of 523 students
from four different universities completed a questionnaire. Structural equation modeling (Amos) was used to test the model.
The model that best describes the relationships in the group of ethnic minority students (N = 145) was shown to be different than the model that best fits the group of majority students (N = 378). Ethnic minority students appeared to feel at home in their educational program if they had a good formal relationship
with teachers and fellow students. Ethnic minority students’ sense of belonging to the institution nevertheless did not contribute
to their study progress. On the other hand, in majority students, informal relationships with fellow students were what led
to a sense of belonging. In these students, the sense of belonging did further academic progress. 相似文献
4.
Rob Kickert Marieke Meeuwisse Karen M. Stegers-Jager Gabriela V. Koppenol-Gonzalez Lidia R. Arends Peter Prinzie 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2019,44(8):1177-1190
AbstractDespite the frequently reported association of characteristics of assessment policies with academic performance, the mechanisms through which these policies affect performance are largely unknown. Therefore, the current research investigated performance, motivation and self-regulation for two groups of students following the same statistics course, but under two assessment policies: education and child studies (ECS) students studied under an assessment policy with relatively higher stakes, a higher performance standard and a lower resit standard, compared with Psychology students. Results show similar initial performance, but more use of resits and higher final performance (post-resit) under the ECS policy compared with the psychology policy. In terms of motivation and self-regulation, under the ECS policy significantly higher minimum grade goals, performance self-efficacy, task value, time and study environment management, and test anxiety were observed, but there were no significant differences in aimed grade goals, academic self-efficacy and effort regulation. The relations of motivational and self-regulatory factors with academic performance were similar between both assessment policies. Thus, educators should be keenly aware of how characteristics of assessment policies are related to students’ motivation, self-regulation and academic performance. 相似文献
5.
Sanne G. A. van Herpen Marieke Meeuwisse W. H. Adriaan Hofman Sabine E. Severiens Lidia R. Arends 《Educational Research and Evaluation》2017,23(1-2):52-72
Given the large number of dropouts in the 1st year at university, it is important to identify early predictors of 1st-year academic success. The present study (n = 453 first-year students) contributes to literature on the transition from secondary to higher education by investigating how the non-cognitive factors pre-university effort and pre-university academic self-efficacy influence 1st-year retention at university. In addition, we examined pre-university reasons for attending university and whether these reasons were related to 1st-year retention. Multinomial logistic regression analyses showed that pre-university effort positively predicted 1st-year retention, whereas pre-university academic self-efficacy did not. With exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, we identified six pre-university reasons for attending university: career perspective, personal development, compliance with the social environment, attractiveness of the institution, recommended by others, and location. None of the pre-university reasons appeared to significantly predict 1st-year retention. Implications for research and practice are discussed. 相似文献
6.
1