排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Seleshi Zeleke 《欧洲特需教育杂志》2013,28(2):145-170
In an attempt to test the assumption that children with learning disabilities (LD) have deficient self‐concepts, a number of studies have compared the self‐concepts of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving (NA) peers. The purpose of this paper is to review recent studies that investigated the academic, social and general self‐concepts of students with LD and their NA peers and compare the results with those of a previous meta‐analysis of relatively older studies, by Chapman. Consistent with earlier findings, results of the present review indicated that the academic self‐concept of LD students is more negative than that of their NA peers. Unlike Chapman’s conclusion, however, the evidence is less clear for general self‐concept. This is also true for social self‐concept. Because the evidence that shows no group differences outweighs that indicating better social and general self‐concept scores for NA children, the conclusion that children with LD hold more negative social and general self‐concepts than do NA children is not warranted. 相似文献
2.
Seleshi Zeleke 《International Journal of Disability, Development & Education》2004,51(3):253-269
Self‐concept ratings of children with mathematics disabilities (MD), average mathematics achievement (AA), and high mathematics achievement (HA) who attended regular classes in grades 4 through 6 were compared. Twenty‐four children in each group, who were selected from an original pool of 811 children, and who were matched one‐to‐one by grade, gender, and nonverbal ability participated in the study. The Culture‐Free Self‐Esteem Inventories (Battle, 1992), a nonverbal ability test, and mathematics achievement tests were administered to all children. Results indicated a marginally significant difference in mathematics self‐concept between the MD and AA groups but no difference between the AA and HA groups. However, children with MD rated themselves more negatively than their HA peers on mathematics, academic, and global subscales. Interestingly, the group differences on academic and general self‐concept measures did not emerge when variations in mathematics self‐concept were controlled, limiting the difference between the MD and HA groups to mathematics self‐concept only. The results suggest that by focusing on children with a specific learning disability and by using domain‐specific academic self‐concept measures, the group differences could be shown to be limited to a subject‐specific self‐concept that is pertinent to the children's area of disability. 相似文献
1