首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   6篇
  免费   0篇
教育   6篇
  2016年   2篇
  2013年   3篇
  1999年   1篇
排序方式: 共有6条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.

This article first examines didactics from an epistemological perspective.

Didactic analysis grasps knowledge as something circulated and/or transmitted. It is distinguished from sociological and psychological approaches to the learning act that legitimize the sociology of education, and from cognitive approaches.

Modifying the learner's individual knowledge so that it conforms to institutional knowledge is a scholastic goal that, in our view, defines the field of didactic research.

The second part of the article proposes answers to these questions: What is the status of the notions taught by the discipline? How are these notions constituted? What is the role of values and knowledge in school exercises and school goals? And what is to be understood by literary culture?

  相似文献   
2.
Martin Buber offers an account of a tendency towards polarisation in responses to the perplexing question of inclusion in education. On the one hand, the educator can be identified as one who includes what is present and becoming within individual young people in isolation from the world. On the other hand, the educator can be recognised as one whose life is dedicated to including young people into the world who have been moulded to conform to established ideals. The influence of these two, divergent but equally flawed, ways of viewing the educator's responsibility to include the young into education is detectable in much current policy and theory that promotes the case for special education. In his rejection of both these views of the educator, Buber envisions a relationship in education that is established neither solely for the sake of the newness of child nor entirely for the preservation of the world. Instead, Buber addresses the living responsibility of an educator who attends to the young and responds to the vastness of creation they represent. The depths of Buber's concept of inclusion are examined and presented as a corrective to the technicalism of special education policy and theory, in which relationships between educators and the young are demarcated by the scope of pre-established and categorised needs.  相似文献   
3.
4.
5.
6.
This article draws on Hannah Arendt’s analysis of authority in education, along with her insights into the workings of the imagination and the thinking process, to argue that participation in education should be conceived as an invitation to become towards the world. The potential of this invitation, the article argues, is located in the educator’s imaginative and thoughtful responsibility to receive the young as they are and as they are becoming on the one hand, and to represent the world to them, on the other hand. The ways in which this potential can be negated are examined in relation to Arendt’s accounts of non-thinking and wilfulness. The article advances to the conclusion that participation in an education is possible only where young persons are received by educators who are persistently awake to their responsibility to receive the young people they educate anew.  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号