排序方式： 共有3条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
2.
3.
When Empirical Success Implies Theoretical Reference: A Structural Correspondence Theorem 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Starting from a brief recapitulation of the contemporary debateon scientific realism, this paper argues for the following thesis:Assume a theory T has been empirically successful in a domainof application A, but was superseded later on by a superiortheory T*, which was likewise successful in A but has an arbitrarilydifferent theoretical superstructure. Then under natural conditionsT contains certain theoretical expressions, which yielded T'sempirical success, such that these T-expressions correspond(in A) to certain theoretical expressions of T*, and given T*is true, they refer indirectly to the entities denoted by theseexpressions of T*. The thesis is first motivated by a studyof the phlogiston–oxygen example. Then the thesis is provedin the form of a logical theorem, and illustrated by furtherexamples. The final sections explain how the correspondencetheorem justifies scientific realism and work out the advantagesof the suggested account.
- Introduction: Pessimistic Meta-induction vs. Structural Correspondence
- The Case of the Phlogiston Theory
- Steps Towards a SystematicCorrespondence Theorem
- The Correspondence Theorem and ItsOntological Interpretation
- Further Historical Applications
- Discussion of the Correspondence Theorem: Objections and Replies
- Consequences for Scientific Realism and Comparison with OtherPositions
- 7.1 Comparison with constructive empiricism
- 7.2Major difference from standard scientific realism
- 7.3 Fromminimal realism and correspondence to scientific realism
- 7.4Comparison with particular realistic positions
- 7.2Major difference from standard scientific realism
- 7.1 Comparison with constructive empiricism
1