首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1篇
  免费   0篇
科学研究   1篇
  2007年   1篇
排序方式: 共有1条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Questions about the function(s) of consciousness have long beencentral to discussions of consciousness in philosophy and psychology.Intuitively, consciousness has an important role to play inthe control of many everyday behaviors. However, this view hasrecently come under attack. In particular, it is becoming increasinglycommon for scientists and philosophers to argue that a significantbody of data emerging from cognitive science shows that consciousstates are not involved in the control of behavior. Accordingto these theorists, nonconscious states control most everydaybehaviors. Andy Clark ([2001]) does an admirable job of summarizingand defending the most important data thought to support thisview. In this paper, I argue that the evidence available doesnot in fact threaten the view that conscious states play animportant and intimate role in the control of much everydaybehavior. I thereby defend a philosophically intuitive viewabout the functions of conscious states in action.
1 Introduction
2 Clarifying EBC
2.1 Control and guidance
2.2 Fine-tunedactivity
3 The empirical case against EBC
4 Conclusion
  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号