首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   57篇
  免费   0篇
教育   57篇
  2016年   1篇
  2014年   6篇
  2011年   1篇
  2010年   5篇
  2009年   6篇
  2008年   3篇
  2007年   5篇
  2006年   2篇
  2005年   2篇
  2004年   4篇
  2003年   5篇
  2002年   5篇
  2001年   2篇
  2000年   1篇
  1999年   1篇
  1998年   2篇
  1996年   2篇
  1994年   2篇
  1993年   2篇
排序方式: 共有57条查询结果,搜索用时 359 毫秒
1.
《增补汇音》声母方面保留了上古音系统的许多特色。阳声韵完整地保留了上古音[-m]、[-n]、[-η]的收尾系统。阴声韵只有“玑”、“葩’,两韵差异较大。入声韵出现了与阳声韵相配的入声和与阴声相配的入声两套。《增补》中出现大量阴入对转现象。《增补》将上古四声分为七音,上古许多入声字,在《增补》中属于上去或下上,这是与上古调类最大的不同。  相似文献   
2.
研究训诂学必须贯彻联系性原则。所谓联系性原则,就是要坚持辩证法的观点,不要孤立地研究词义。这有两方面的涵义:一是要把词义的解释研究同音韵学、字学、语法学、修辞学等有关学科联系起来;一是要把词义的研究与化历史联系起来。  相似文献   
3.
本文旨在对昆明话的音系系统进行较为全面的分析,探讨昆明话音系的系统规律。主要讨论两个问题:第一,昆明话音系基元模式;第二,用管辖音系理论的六个音系元素重标示昆明话的元音和辅音,并归纳其中的内在规律。  相似文献   
4.
庄子运用"重言"的言说手段借他人之口传达己意,其语言具备汪洋恣肆、音韵和谐、深邃隽永等鲜明的诗性色彩.本文从想象、音韵、意境三个方面对《庄子》"重言"中语言的诗质特色进行了详致的探究.  相似文献   
5.
《中国音韵学研究》是研究汉语言文字学的重要经典著作之一,它的出版标志着现代音韵学的诞生。但古音字类表存在的一些讹夺等现象尚未引起前修时贤的关注。现参照《康熙字典》、《广韵》等辞书,分类列举古音字类表的疏漏现象,并以声母表和韵母表中韵字对应的情况稍加说明。  相似文献   
6.
索绪尔用“音位学”指称“语音学”,但是他强调“音响形象”的对立带来的意义的差别,因此可以说:索绪尔有明确的现代音位学思想。  相似文献   
7.
声韵学过去被称为“天书”,但它也是“小学”的核心。对于有志于古代学术的同志而言,必须要有所掌握。张闻玉教授对天文历术和小学两个领域,一直深有研究。其新著《古音学基础》,尤其适合初学者,是学习和掌握声韵学的不二之选。  相似文献   
8.
The interaction of lexical and non-lexicalprocesses in spelling was investigated throughlexical priming of non-lexical spelling, inPolish, a language in whose relativelytransparent orthography lexical informationmight be expected to play a less influentialrole than in English. Orthographic choice fornonwords was assessed under free and primedspelling conditions for both adults andchildren using direct and associative priming.The findings indicated that lexical orthographyinfluences resolution of nonlexical phonologyin spelling and identified two sources ofinfluence: one in unprimed spelling, wherelong-standing orthographic knowledge affectednonword orthographic choice so that it was notdetermined solely by phonology, the other inprimed spelling, where orthographic solutionsto nonwords were influenced by the covertorthography of the prime. The most powerfulevidence for lexical influence comes from thefinding that lexical orthography not onlyinforms resolution of phonology in cases ofambiguity, but overrides phonology whenresolution is unambiguous.  相似文献   
9.
Evidence of phonological awareness levels usually comes from English-speaking children. The evidence in Spanish is scarce. The present study examined the phonological awareness of syllables, onsets–rimes, and phonemes, extending the Treiman and Zukowski (1991) results to preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. The sample comprised preschoolers, kindergarteners and first-graders. Children found syllables easier than onset–rime units, and onset–rime units easier than phoneme units (Experiments 1 and 2). Preliterate children found ending units easier than beginning units. However, literate children were best at initial linguistic units, particularly initial syllables. Results on the phonological awareness task and on the masked priming lexical decision task support that the phonological awareness development is sensitive to the orthographic units used by children from the time they begin to read (Experiment 3). For all children, initial continuant consonants were easier than stop consonants.  相似文献   
10.
The dissociation between phonological and orthographic processes in word reading was investigated in a study involving 147 children in grade 3. The criterion measure was a timed word reading test. Two tasks assessed phonological skills and two tasks assessed orthographical skills. Orthographic ability accounted for variance in word reading even after phonological ability had been controlled. Poor readers differed from skilled readers in the way phonological and orthographic factors were balanced. The relationship between the two factors was fairly strong among poor readers, whereas the correlation was low for more skilled readers. Furthermore, phonological factors played a much stronger role in explaining the variance in word reading among poor readers, while on the other hand, orthographic factors were more powerful among skilled readers.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号