排序方式： 共有4条查询结果，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Web2.0环境下的资源发现与服务传递:以Primo和Encore为例 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
Web2.0环境下图书馆面临一些问题,包括商业化信息服务系统带来的冲击、OPAC不能满足用户的检索需求以及电子资源服务系统的局限性。本文以Primo和Encore为例,首先对新一代资源发现和服务传递系统的功能进行了解析,包括一站式检索、丰富的信息组织和揭示、个性化和社会化功能,然后探讨了Primo和Encore的不同。最后展望了图书馆信息服务系统的发展趋势,包括进行统一资源管理,浏览和搜索并重以及在用户的环境中嵌入服务。 相似文献
2.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(4):375-376
Libraries today face an increasing challenge: to provide relevant information to diverse populations with differing needs while competing with Web search engines like Google. In 2009, a large group of libraries, including the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Libraries, joined with Innovative Interfaces as development partners to design a new type of discovery tool. The concept of information portals best supports the research and instructional needs of our communities by organizing and presenting information that incorporates licensed databases, text, multimedia, and other relevant sources. The discovery tool under examination by University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Encore integrates searches of the catalog, locally created full-text and image sources, and articles from licensed databases with navigation options that facilitate narrowing and expanding search results. This information portal development is an ongoing process with the goal of providing a tool that is as easy to use as Web search engines and that preserves the quality that library users expect. This article explores the requirements for an information portal and describes the challenges University of Nebraska-Lincoln faced when implementing Encore. Statistics from the initial implementation are presented, along with recommendations for future usability studies to evaluate where additional improvements should be made. 相似文献
3.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(1):14-27
ABSTRACTDiscovery tools are used in libraries to bring together books, articles, and other resources. Research has focused on user and librarian evaluation of these tools, but there are few evaluations of non-book and non-article sources. Discovery tools can also include metadata for local collections harvested through the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). Creating these harvests can be time consuming for staff, so it is important for libraries to understand if and how patrons use these records. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln Libraries (UNL Libraries) harvests metadata from local collections into the Encore discovery tool. A study was conducted to analyze patron use of OAI-harvested records. This study analyzed usage data for harvested collections obtained from different discovery sources and referrals through Encore. Google Analytics was used to evaluate searcher behavior differences between content referred through Encore and other referrals. Although discovery through Encore did not result in high numbers of traffic, there is evidence that patrons who discover records through Encore take more time looking through records than patrons using other discovery methods. This increase in time is a measure of engagement and may be reason enough for libraries to consider adding OAI-harvested collections to their discovery tool. 相似文献
4.
新一代图书馆用户界面的比较研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
为提高图书馆的用户服务,新一代的OPAC用户界面应运而生。本文评述了LibraryThing、PennTags、Encore和AquaBrowser这4个全新的图书馆用户界面,并对它们进行了比较。 相似文献
1