排序方式： 共有3条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
LibraryThing对我国社区图书馆建设的启示 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
通过LibraryThing简介及其与我国社区图书馆的建设模式的比较分析,发现当前我国社区图书馆建设模式在资源建设方面、人员组织方面、经费方面及技术方面都存在问题。据此,对LibraryThing在人力资源、文献资源建设、技术设备、书目检索、资金、读者等方面的优势加以探讨,以期给我国社区图书馆的建设带来启示。 相似文献
2.
《Journal of Web Librarianship》2013,7(4):309-331
Perhaps the greatest power of folksonomies, especially when set against controlled vocabularies like the Library of Congress Subject Headings, lies in their capacity to empower user communities to name their own resources in their own terms. This article analyzes the potential and limitations of both folksonomies and controlled vocabularies for transgender materials by analyzing the subject headings in WorldCat records and the user-generated tags in LibraryThing for books with transgender themes. A close examination of the subject headings and tags for twenty books on transgender topics reveals a disconnect between the language used by people who own these books and the terms authorized by the Library of Congress and assigned by catalogers to describe and organize transgender-themed books. The terms most commonly assigned by users are far less common or non-existent in WorldCat. The folksonomies also provide spaces for a multiplicity of representations, including a range of gender expressions, whereas these entities are often absent from Library of Congress Subject Headings and WorldCat. While folksonomies are democratic and respond quickly to shifts and expansions of categories, they lack control and may inhibit findability of resources. Neither tags nor subject headings are perfect systems by themselves, but they may complement each other well in library catalogs. Bringing users’ voices into catalogs through the addition of tags might greatly enhance organization, representation, and retrieval of transgender-themed materials. 相似文献
3.
新一代图书馆用户界面的比较研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
为提高图书馆的用户服务,新一代的OPAC用户界面应运而生。本文评述了LibraryThing、PennTags、Encore和AquaBrowser这4个全新的图书馆用户界面,并对它们进行了比较。 相似文献
1