排序方式： 共有4条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
James C. McCroskey passed away on December 27, 2012. He contributed immensely to the study of human communication. He led the field in in-field publications and citations. Perhaps his most lasting contribution is naming and measuring communication constructs. James C. McCroskey contributed substantially to Communication Research Reports as a past editor, editorial board member, and contributing author. This essay is a personal and professional remembrance of James C. McCroskey. 相似文献
2.
Jim McCroskey: Professional Mentor 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Mark Hickson 《Communication Research Reports》2018,35(1):85-89
The author discusses the discipline’s most productive scholar through a series of encounters the two shared. The focus is not on McCroskey’s own research, as it is about the high rate of productivity of his students and colleagues. In addition, this article describes what kinds of actions McCroskey undertook to build and maintain a high-quality program for more than two decades. 相似文献
3.
Ann Bainbridge Frymier 《Communication Research Reports》2018,35(3):195-199
This essay is the third in a series recognizing the contributions of James C. McCroskey to the communication discipline. Instructional communication was a passion of McCroskey’s, and much of his professional life was devoted to nurturing this area of scholarship. McCroskey’s approach to graduate education and his mentoring of students is credited with being central to the development of instructional communication. His research was both developmental and transformative and will influence instructional communication scholarship for years to come. 相似文献
4.
Matthew M. Martin 《Communication Research Reports》2018,35(4):373-377
Editor’s Note: This essay reflects the final in our five-part set of essays on the career of Communication Research Reports founding editor, James C. McCroskey. In these previous essays, Levine and Park (2017) offered the opening essay in our series, with a professional and personal rememberance of a scholar deeply impactful on both of their careers. Hickson (2018) commented on McCroskey’s formal and informal mentorship styles, and how others might understand the critical importance of offering oneself to one’s peers. Park, Oh, and Ryu (2018) explained the unique impact of McCroskey’s research on communication scholarship in South Korea, and Frymier (2018) reminded us of McCroskey’s impact as a core scholar for instructional communication research. In this final essay, we reached out to current West Virginia University Department of Communication chair Matthew M. Martin for his thoughts. As McCroskey spent most of his career at WVU (including a 25-year stretch as the department chair, from 1972 to 1997), inviting the current chair of that department for a closing commentary seemed most fitting. We hope that these five essays serve as a memorial to a scholar whose career and influence extends far beyond his publication record. 相似文献
1