排序方式： 共有8条查询结果，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Luciana Duranti 《Archival Science》2001,1(1):39-55
Archival science is to be regarded as a system. The properties of that system can be investigated and integrated. The methodology
to do so has been tested in two research projects which are presented in this article as examples of the way in which the
view of archival science as a system supports the development of new knowledge and as a demonstration of the stability of
archival theory.
This article presupposes that the archival discipline is also a “science”. Many have argued against the idea on the basis
of a common perception that a science is a type of study entirely objective by virtue of the rigorous manner in which it is
carried out and the restricted range of topics to which it applies. In fact, the activity of science is based upon a complex
framework of assumptions that make it possible for the landscape of the scientific endeavour to be redrawn over time, and,
while striving towards objectivity, considers it to be an unattainable ideal. 相似文献
2.
The Archival Bond 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Luciana Duranti 《Archives and Museum Informatics》1997,11(3-4):213-218
This paper presents the concept of archival bond as formulated by archival science and used in a research project carried out at the University of British Columbia, entitled The Preservation of Electronic Records. Being one of the essential components of the record, the concept of archival bond is discussed in the context of the traditional diplomatic and archival definitions of records, and its function in demonstrating the reliability and authenticity of records is shown. The most serious challenge with which we are confronted is to make explicit and preserve intact over the long term the archival bond between electronic and non electronic records belonging in the same aggregations. 相似文献
3.
The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*
This article presents the concept of electronic record as articulated by the first phase of the InterPARES (International research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems) Project (1999–2001) and discusses it in light of the findings of the second phase of the Project (2002–2006). While InterPARES 1 focused on records produced and/or maintained in databases and document management systems, InterPARES 2 examined records produced and/or maintained in interactive, experiential and dynamic environments. The authors describe the characteristics of these environments and of the entities found in them in the course of case studies conducted on systems used for carrying out artistic, scientific and e-government activities, and propose the new concept of record that InterPARES 2 is eleborating, which expands on that formulated by InterPARES 1.The authors would like to thank InterPARES 2 research assistant Randy Preston for his careful editing and constructive criticisms. Some of his suggestions have been incorporated in the text of this article. 相似文献
4.
Bruno Delmas 《Archival Science》2001,1(1):25-37
It is only a few decades ago that archivists befan to redefine their discipline in terms of a science. This redefinition of
archives and records management was the consequence of a growing need for an adequate expression referring to a comprehensive
new body of knowledge on records and archives. Consensus on how to adequately define archival science has not been achieved
yet, however. As information society evolves, records and archives are changing in nature and status. It is an emerging discipline
that has to be defined, which is still bears the impress of the mindset and practices of the industrial society. Bruno Delmas
shows the archivist some clues to find a way out of this ambiguity and keep communicating human heritage to unknown generations. 相似文献
5.
Bruno Delmas 《Archival Science》1987,1(1):25-37
It is only a few decades ago that archivists befan to redefine theirdiscipline in terms of a science. This redefinition of archives and records management was the consequence of a growing need for an adequate expression referring to a comprehensive new body of knowledge on records and archives. Consensus on how to adequately define archival sciencehas not been achieved yet, however. As information society evolves,records and archives are changing in nature and status. It is anemerging discipline that has to be defined, which is still bearsthe impress of the mindset and practices of the industrial society.Bruno Delmas shows the archivist some clues to find a way out of thisambiguity and keep communicating human heritage to unknown generations. 相似文献
6.
Maria Guercio 《Archives and Museum Informatics》1997,11(3-4):219-222
For the definition of electronic records, the use of new terms, like literary warrant, is not necessary, and for the European perspective even not understandable. If this expression simply means best practice and professional culture in recordkeeping, we only to know what creators did for centuries and still do today and probably will do also in the future, by referring to the archival science, diplomatics and archival practice for clarifying definitions in the recordkeeping environment. A multi-disciplinary approach is still required for the electronic recordkeeping system as it was in the past for traditional records, but the theory and the terminology should be consistent and based on the deep understanding of essential characteristics of records and essential requirements of good recordkeeping to produce in the first place and maintain reliable and authentic records. Of course, a record is more than recorded information created in the course of business activity: a record is the recorded representation of an act produced in a specific form – the form prescribed by the legal system – by a creator in the course of its activity. 相似文献
7.
This article presents the concept of electronic record as articulated by the first phase of the InterPARES (International
research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems) Project (1999-2001) and discusses it in light of the findings
of the second phase of the Project (2002-2006). While InterPARES 1 focused on records produced and/or maintained in databases
and document management systems, InterPARES 2 examined records produced and/or maintained in interactive, experiential and
dynamic environments. The authors describe the characteristics of these environments and of the entities found in them in
the course of case studies conducted on systems used for carrying out artistic, scientific and e-government activities, and
propose the new concept of record that InterPARES 2 is eleborating, which expands on that formulated by InterPARES 1.
The authors would like to thank InterPARES 2 research assistant Randy Preston for his careful editing and constructive criticisms.
Some of his suggestions have been incorporated in the text of this article. 相似文献
8.
Luciana Duranti 《Archival Science》1987,1(1):39-55
Archival science is to be regarded as a system. The properties of that system can be investigated and integrated. The methodology
to do so has been tested in two research projects which are presented in this article as examples of the way in which the
view of archival science as a system supports the development of new knowledge and as a demonstration of the stability of
archival theory.
This article presupposes that the archival discipline is also a “science”. Many have argued against the idea on the basis
of a common perception that a science is a type of study entirely objective by virtue of the rigorous manner in which it is
carried out and the restricted range of topics to which it applies. In fact, the activity of science is based upon a complex
framework of assumptions that make it possible for the landscape of the scientific endeavour to be redrawn over time, and,
while striving towards objectivity, considers it to be an unattainable ideal. 相似文献
1