In a daily time–place learning task,time is only used as a discriminative stimulus if each daily session is associated with a distinct spatial location |
| |
| Authors: | Scott H Deibel Matthew L Ingram Andrew B Lehr Hiliary C Martin Darlene M Skinner Gerard M Martin Isaac M W Hughes Christina M Thorpe |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, A1B 3X9, Canada
|
| |
| Abstract: | It is difficult for rats to acquire daily time–place (TP) learning tasks. One theory suggests that rats do not use time of day as a stimulus signaling a specific response. In the present study, we tested rats’ ability to use time of day as a discriminative stimulus. A fixed-interval procedure was used in which one lever provided reinforcement on a FI-5-s schedule in morning sessions, and the same lever provided reinforcement on a FI-30-s schedule in afternoon sessions. Because only one place was used in this paradigm, the rats could only use time of day to acquire the task. Mean responses during the first 5 s of the first trial in each session indicated that the rats did not discriminate between the two sessions. In Phase II, a different lever location was used for each of the two daily sessions, which meant that both spatial and temporal information could be used to acquire the task. The rats readily acquired the task in this phase, and probe trials indicated that the rats were using a combination of spatial and temporal information to discriminate between the two different trial types. When the spatial cue was removed in Phase III, rats no longer discriminated the two sessions, suggesting that time can only be used as a discriminative stimulus when each daily session is associated with a distinct spatial location. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
