Mapping cultural assets and evaluating significance: theory,methodology and practice |
| |
| Authors: | David Lee Abigail Gilmore |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Institute of Communications Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds , United Kingdom;2. Institute for Cultural Practices, University of Manchester , Manchester , United Kingdom |
| |
| Abstract: | Over the last decade in the UK, there has been a notable shift in the popularity and use of cultural mapping as a methodology for policy making at a regional and local level. This follows increased demand for an informed framework for planning arts and cultural facilities from local and regional government and from within the cultural sector (Evans, 2008: p. 65). The article begins with an exploration of cultural mapping within cultural policy, which explores the context for the growth in this area of activity, and why this kind of activity appeals to policy makers and organisations. It then goes on to examine four cultural mapping exercises which have been undertaken in recent years in the UK. These studies have been chosen because although they all focus the mapping of cultural assets within a specific geographic area, they differ to one degree or another in purpose, context, definition, geographic scale and methodology. They illustrate the narrow range of approaches deployed in the cultural mapping field in the UK, and as such provide a useful means of critically reviewing their limits as well as highlighting the issues and challenges faced by cultural cartography in practice. The article concludes by considering the type of mapping research that is “allowed” within the discursive confines of consultancy based cultural policy research. |
| |
| Keywords: | cultural planning housing growth areas cultural mapping evidence based policy cultural significance |
|
|
