| 科学理性与自由主义 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈克艰.科学理性与自由主义[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,35(6):12-20. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈克艰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海社会科学院,历史研究所,上海,200020 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 哈耶克和波普尔两位自由主义者对科学理性及其与自由的关系有截然不同的看法,而量子物理的互补诠释则能表明科学内在精神与自由主义的一致性。N·玻尔以互补观点对量子力学带来的新的认识论局势作了精确而全面的说明。互补观点向广泛的认识领域的推扩,完全不同于以牛顿力学为根据引申出来的因果决定论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 哈耶克 波普尔 科学理性 自由主义 互补诠释 玻尔 笛卡尔 量子力学 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5579(2003)06-0012-09 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年3月21日 |
Scientific Rationality and Liberalism |
| |
| CHEN Ke-jian.Scientific Rationality and Liberalism[J].Journal of East China Normal University :Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition,2003,35(6):12-20. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Ke-jian |
| |
| Institution: | CHEN Ke-jian |
| |
| Abstract: | Both F. A. Hayek and K. Popper are important and famous liberals in the twentieth century. Though their viewpoints about scientific rationality and its relation to freedom are quite different from each other, their complementary interpretations of quantum mechanics illustrate a kind of conforma-bility between the inner spirit of science and liberalism. Starting with a complementary view, N. Bohr makes a comprehensive and precise explanation of the new epistemological situation caused by quantum mechanics. The extension of the complementary viewpoint to other cognitive areas is completely different from the spread of causal determinism that is based on Newtonian mechanics. |
| |
| Keywords: | complementarity causality rationality freedom |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
