| 中美两国专利临时禁令制度比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙海龙,姚建军.中美两国专利临时禁令制度比较研究[J].中国专利与商标,2008(3):24-32. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙海龙 姚建军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]西北工业大学教授 [2]西安市中级人民法院副院长 [3]西安市中级人民法院知识产权审判庭副庭长 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 问题的提出
我国《专利法》中所称的诉前“停止侵犯专利权行为的措施“，在英美法系和大陆法系中被称为临时禁令（preliminary injunction）或者中间禁令（interlocutory injunction or interim injunction），TRIPS协议第9条称为临时措施。虽然名称不同，但是实质内容是基本一致的，即在对专利侵权诉讼赏体审判最终裁决之前，由法院依据权利人的申请，作出要求被控侵权人停止侵犯专利权行为的裁决。
|
| 关 键 词： | 专利权 TRIPS协议 侵权诉讼 《专利法》 大陆法系 权利人 行为 裁决 |
A Comparative Study of System of Patent Preliminary Injunction in China and United States |
| |
| Institution: | Sun Hailong, Yao Jianjun (Professor of the Northwest Polytechnic University, and Vice-President of the Xian City Intermediate People＇s Court;Deputy-Head of the IP Tribunal of the Xian City Intermediate People＇s Court) |
| |
| Abstract: | Raising of the issue
The measures to cease acts of patent infringement mentioned in the Chinese Patent Law are known as the preliminary, or interlocutory or interim injunction） in the common law system and civil law system, and as the provisional measures in Article 9 of the TRIPS Agreement. Though with different name, they are substantially identical in that before making its final judgment on the subject matter of a patent infringement lawsuit, the court makes its judgment requiring the accused infringer to cease its or his act of patent infringement at the request of the rightholder.1 During the lawsuit, to cease, in a timely manner, an act of ongoing or imminent infringement of rightholder＇s right, the court is empowered to grant an injunction, i.e. preliminary injunction, at an interested party＇s request, to prohibit or restrict an actor from performing a certain act. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
