| 宋代三苏的史论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 粟品孝.宋代三苏的史论[J].成都师专学报,2010(1):1-6. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 粟品孝 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学历史文化学院,四川成都610064 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 四川省繁荣发展哲学社会科学协调小组重大项目“巴蜀文化通史”子课题“史学卷”（第13号）. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 宋代三苏文史兼长，史论作品极为丰富。史论是三苏史学的重心所在，主要包括史亨评论和史学评论两部分。前者以观风察势为核心，以借古鉴今为目的；后者以苏洵的经史观、苏轼的正统论和苏辙评论《史记》最有名。三苏史论在形式上笔势纵横，议论横生，在内容上喜言得失成败，罕及纲常伦理，与理学家的论史尺度迥然不同，不仅在宋代占有重要地位，在宋以降的历史长河中亦有很大的影响力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 宋代 三苏 史论 |
The Three Sus＇ Historical Reviews |
| |
| SU Pin-xiao.The Three Sus＇ Historical Reviews[J].Journal of Chengdu Teachers College,2010(1):1-6. |
| |
| Authors: | SU Pin-xiao |
| |
| Institution: | SU Pin-xiao ( School of History ＆ Culture, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610064, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The Three Sus, talented at both history and literature, created plenty of historical essays. Their essays are classified in- to two categories： critique on historical events and critique on historical studies. The former lays stress on observation and analysis of contemporary events, aims at drawing lessons from the past; while the latter is famous for Su Xun＇s view of historiography and Confucian classics, Su Shi＇s orthodox theory and Su Zhe＇s commentary on Shiji. All of their reviews were written magnificently and wittily in style and comments, discussing the gains and losses, seldom dealing with cardinal guides and constant virtues, which meant the Three Sus＇ yardstick of historical critique was radically different from those of neo-Confueians. This yardstick not only occupied an important position in the Song Dynasty, but also had a great influence in the history thereafter. |
| |
| Keywords: | the Song Dynasty the Three Sus historical essays |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
