| “一边倒”－中美关系的历史反思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 姜中才,魏子扬.“一边倒”－中美关系的历史反思[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2002,25(4):98-102. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 姜中才 魏子扬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 大连大学人文学院,辽宁大连,116622
2. 辽宁省委党校学报编辑部,辽宁沈阳,110004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 抗战胜利前后,中共认真考虑使中国成为沟通美苏之“桥梁”。美出于使中国成为“大国”政策,一度曾积极调处国共矛盾。但“大国”的实质是反苏反共之“屏障”,所扶核心只能是国民党,即使明知其必将为中国革命所推翻。面对“推翻”现实,美虽推出“灵活”政策,寻求与中共建立某种“承认”关系的可能,但囿于其顽固的意识形态,终不愿断绝与台湾的外交关系,并终将中共推向与苏结盟的“一边倒”轨道,尽管这是一个历史合力的作用结果。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中美关系 “大国”政策 事实 “一边倒” |
| 文章编号： | 1000-1751(2002)04-0098-05 |
Retrospect and Reflection of the "Leaning to one Side" Policy |
| |
| JIANG Zhong cai ,WEI Zi yang.Retrospect and Reflection of the "Leaning to one Side" Policy[J].Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition),2002,25(4):98-102. |
| |
| Authors: | JIANG Zhong cai WEI Zi yang |
| |
| Institution: | JIANG Zhong cai 1,WEI Zi yang 2 |
| |
| Abstract: | After winning the Anti Japanese War, the CPC didn't intend to adopt the "leaning to one side" policy. Rather, it gave a serious consideration to a long term cooperation with the United States and wanted to make China a bridge to connect the United States and the Soviet Union. To achieve the aim of making China a member of the "big powers", such as the United States, the Soviet Union and the UK, the American government actively reconciled the conflicts between the CPC and the KMT. To make China a member of the "big powers" was but a protective screen of the American government's anti Soviet Union and anti CPC. Therefore, it was the KMT, but not the CPC, that, they hoped, must have the dominating role. Based on this, the American government laid down the following policy: when the conflicts between the KMT and the CPC couldn't be reconciled and the KMT was responsible for the unsuccessful reconcilement, the American government could only support Jiang Jie shi and oppose the CPC, though it knew that the KMT government was bound to be overthrown by the Chinese revolution. Being faced with the reality of the KMT government being overthrown sooner or later, the American government adopted the "motionless" policy of "being flexible" and "getting away", and searched for the possibility of establishing some "admitting" relation. Yet, due to its stubborn ideology, the American government was unwilling to terminate its diplomatic relation with Taiwan. As a result, the CPC "leaned to one side" and became an alliance of the Soviet Union. This was an "ideal" result for none of the three "big powers". Neither was it an "ideal" result for the mutual relationship between the three "big powers" and the world peace. The lesson drawn from this historical fact was meaningful and thought provoking. |
| |
| Keywords: | big power" "bridge" "reconcile" "admit" "lean to one side |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
