| 中美大学生篮球联赛赛制的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 米靖,李青,张传义.中美大学生篮球联赛赛制的比较研究[J].西安体育学院学报,2003,20(5):80-82. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 米靖 李青 张传义 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 山东农业大学,体育教学部,山东,泰安,271018
2. 西安工业大学,体育部,陕西,西安,710000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过分析比较中美大学生篮球联赛的赛制,笔者发现CUBA联赛的基层预赛普遍采用的赛会制时间跨度短、比赛场次少,同时剥夺了多数院校的主场机会,未能真正体现基层预赛作为联赛基础的重要性;CUBA联赛分区赛存在名额太少,同时多数院校失去的主场机会;分区赛存在名额太少、各分区缺乏交流的机会以及强队过于集中等缺陷。而NCAA64强赛赛制科学、合理,为各队提供了公平竞赛的机会;为此,建议借鉴NCAA联赛的经验,改革目前CUBA联赛赛制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中美大学生 篮球联赛 赛制 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-747X(2003)05-0080-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年1月5日 |
A Comparative Study On Competitive System of College Basketball Tournament Between China and USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Study purpose: this study compares and analyses current situation of college basketball′s competitive system between China and USA, in order to provide help for CUBA tournament. Methods: document and material method; interview and investigation method; mathematical statistics; comparative analysis method. Conclusions: Compared with NCAA tournament, sports-meeting system, which has been adopted generally by basic-level preliminaries of CUBA tournament has the shortcomings of short time stretch, few numbers of showings, And has deprived most colleges and universities of home-ground, not truly embodying the importance of basic-level preliminaries as tournament basis; Branches of CUBA tournament have the shortcomings of few competitive number, shortage of communicative chance amid branches, over-concentration of strong teams, which has restricted the deep development of CUBA tournament, while the NCAA championship is scientific and reasonable and it provides chances of fair competition for teams; The CUBA tournament final stages also have many problems which deserve to be further discussed. Advice: Use the experience of NCAA tournament for reference, and reform the present competitive system of CUBA torunament. |
| |
| Keywords: | competitive system university student of China and USA basketball tournament comparative study |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
