| “三公开”背景下媒体对民事诉讼监督的有限性 |
| |
| 作者单位： | ;1.河南工业大学法学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 媒体对司法进行监督已经成为一种常态。民事诉讼,因其解决的纠纷具有特定性、更为尊重当事人的意思自治以及处理结果相对柔和等三个异于刑事诉讼和行政诉讼的特质,如果媒体对其进行过度监督,一方面可能侵犯当事人的隐私,另一方面也可能会不当干涉审判权的行使。基于司法"三公开"的大背景,我们在肯定媒体对民事诉讼进行监督具有必要性的前提下,一方面要合理限制媒体对案件事实的采访报道,另一方面要绝对禁止媒体对案件处理结果的不当干预,从而构建一种媒体监督与民事诉讼良性互动的有限监督机制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 媒体监督 民事诉讼 有限性 “三公开” |
The Limitation of the Media's Supervision upon Civil Litigation under the Context of "Three Opens" |
| |
| Institution: | ,School of Law,Henan University of Technology |
| |
| Abstract: | Media's supervision upon justice has already become a normality. Civil litigation has three distinct characteristics-the peculiarity of the disputes to be solved,more respect of the parties' autonomy of will as well as the comparative gentleness of the disposition which are quite different from criminal litigation and administrative litigation. So if media carries out an excessive supervision upon civil litigation,on one hand it might offend parties' privacy,on the other hand,it might also unjustifiably interfere with the performance of the power of trial. Based on the great context of " three opens" of justice and under the prerequisite that it is necessary to undertake media supervision upon civil litigation,we should on one hand rationally limit the interview and report to the case fact by the medias,and on the other hand absolutely forbid the unjustifiable interference on the disposition of the case by medias,thus to establish a limited supervision mechanism based on the positive interaction between media supervision and civil litigation. |
| |
| Keywords: | media supervision civil litigation limitation three opens |
|
|
