| 科技项目中社会影响评议准则的内涵与启示 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周建中.科技项目中社会影响评议准则的内涵与启示[J].科学学研究,2012,30(12):1795-1801. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周建中 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院科技政策与管理科学研究所,北京,100190 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中国科学院知识创新工程评估专项(Y200011601) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 随着科技投入的增加,政府和公众都期望科学研究对社会发展有更多的贡献,要求在科技项目的评议中考察对社会的影响等相关性内容。以美国国家科学基金会(NSF)为首的科研资助机构率先对评议准则进行了修改,将同行评议扩展为价值评议(Merit Review)。本文以美国NSF的价值评议要点及科学家对此的争论为切入点,分析不同科研资助机构如美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)、美国能源部(DOE)、欧盟框架计划(ECFP)等科技项目评议中有关社会影响方面的评议准则的内涵,对评议专家的要求等内容,并结合我国目前科技项目的评价现状提出了建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技项目 社会影响评议准则 启示与建议 |
The suggestion and content of social impact evaluation criterion on S&T project |
| |
| ZHOU Jian-zhong.The suggestion and content of social impact evaluation criterion on S&T project[J].Studies in Science of Science,2012,30(12):1795-1801. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Jian-zhong |
| |
| Institution: | ZHOU Jian-zhong(Institute of Policy and Management,CAS,Beijing 100190,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | With the increase of investment on S&T,government and public expect more contributions to science research on social development,and ask to examine the social impact in the review of the S&T project.Some research funding agencies like NSF modify the review criterion which make peer review to the merit review.In this paper,we first introduce NSF merit review content and the controversy form the scientist,then we analyzed the review criterion of social impact from all kinds of research funding agencies in the world,such as National Institutes of Health(NIH),Department of Energy(DOE),the European Commission Framework Programmers(ECFP).Lastly,we present the suggestion on the evaluation of S&T project in China. |
| |
| Keywords: | S&T Project the review criterion of social impact suggestion |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
