| 案例分析视角下科研不端行为处置流程与原则 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔通.案例分析视角下科研不端行为处置流程与原则[J].科技管理研究,2018(24). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔通 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学技术信息研究所 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于不同程度科研不端行为视角,以美国、日本、中国的4个典型科研失信案例为研究对象,通过分析其案例背景、处置流程、处理结果,发现在典型的科研不端行为案例中,科研机构充当首要责任主体,政府、科研机构、学术共同体介入时间清晰,强调治理的法制化;在有争议的研究行为案例中,学术期刊充当主体并采取同行评议与学术不端系统相结合的防范措施,各主体加强联动开展教育活动等原则。
|
| 关 键 词： | 典型的科研不端行为 有争议的研究行为 处置流程 处置原则 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018/8/6 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2018/8/17 0:00:00 |
The disposal process and principle of scientific research misconduct from the perspective of case analysis |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on the perspectives of scientific misconduct in different degrees, four typical cases of scientific misconduct in the United States, Japan and China were taken as the research objects. By analyzing their case background, treatment process and treatment results, it was found that in typical cases of scientific misconduct, scientific research institutions acted as the primary responsibility subjects.,and the government, scientific research institutions and academic community have a clear time of intervention, emphasizing the legalization of governance In the case of controversial research behaviors, academic journals act as the main body and take preventive measures combining peer review and academic misconduct system, and each subject strengthens the principle of linkage education. |
| |
| Keywords: | typical scientific misconduct controversial research behavior processing and results disposal principle |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
