| 基于文献计量的负责任研究与创新领域国际研究现状、演化路径及关键内容分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋永辉,马廷灿,岳名亮,魏欣月.基于文献计量的负责任研究与创新领域国际研究现状、演化路径及关键内容分析[J].科技管理研究,2023(8):82-92. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋永辉 马廷灿 岳名亮 魏欣月 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 中国科学院武汉文献情报中心;2. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系;3. 科技大数据湖北省重点实验室;4. 黑龙江大学信息管理学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中国科学院战略研究与决策支持系统建设专项“青年科学家遴选、评价和培养政策研究”(项目编号：GHJ-ZLZX-2021-22-2) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 负责任研究与创新（RRI）始于科学界对责任伦理的讨论，后来渗透到社会发展与新兴科技发展研究中。目前国内缺乏对全球RRI研究进展与发展脉络的系统性梳理，因此以1999—2022年Web of Science核心合集数据库收录的1 599篇相关文献为研究对象，采用文献计量法与主路径分析法，在定性定量双重视角下，从发文趋势、主导研究力量、热点研究主题、知识演化路径、关键研究内容等5个维度厘清相关知识演化脉络，并揭示主导研究力量与热点研究主题，以期为我国科技政策管理人员决策和国内RRI研究发展提供参考。研究发现：国际上RRI研究在2012年进入快速发展阶段，当前在科学史与哲学、道德与伦理学、管理学、社会科学等领域中有较多的研究成果，研究的基础知识结构完备、主路径清晰，共有10篇核心文献；主导研究国家为荷兰、英国、美国、德国、西班牙，我国排在第15位；主导研究机构为瓦格宁根大学、代尔夫特理工大学、亚利桑那州立大学、牛津大学、德蒙福特大学，核心学者包括Stilgoe、Owen、Stahl、Fisher和Blok；形成了科技创新过程中科研伦理与科研诚信、公民科学与新兴技术伦理风险、创新管理体系与可持...
|
| 关 键 词： | 负责任研究 负责任创新 科研伦理 文献计量 主路径分析 定性定量相结合 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022/9/1 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2023/4/24 0:00:00 |
Analysis of the Current Status, Evolutionary Path and Key Elements of International Research in the Field of Responsible Research and Innovation Based on Bibliometrics |
| |
| Abstract: | Responsible research and innovation (RRI) started from the discussion of responsible ethics in the scientific community and later permeated into the research on social development and emerging science and technology development. At present, there is a lack of systematic review of global RRI research progress and development context in China, therefore, this paper collects 1 599 relevant literature in the Web of Science core collection database from 1999 to 2022 as the research objects, uses the bibliometric method and main path analysis to clarifies the knowledge evolution of RRI from five dimensions, namely, publication trend, leading research forces, hot research topics, knowledge evolution path, and key research contents, also reveals the leading research forces and hot research themes, to provide a reference for the decision-making of science and technology policy management in China and the domestic RRI research development. It finds that: international RRI research entered a rapid development stage in 2012, currently there are more research results in the fields of history and philosophy of science, morality and ethics, management, social science, etc., and the basic knowledge structure of the research is complete and the main path is clear, and there are 10 core papers; the leading research countries are the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany, and Spain, and China ranks 15th; the leading research institutions are Wageningen University, Delft University of Technology, Arizona State University, Oxford University, De Montfort University, and the core scholars include Stilgoe, Owen, Stahl, Fisher, and Blok; three major thematic clusters are formed, including research ethics and research integrity in the process of science and technology innovation, ethical risks in citizen science and emerging technologies, and innovation management systems and sustainable development. The key research contents are broadly divided into four major areas, including responsible innovation under public participation mechanisms, ethical governance of emerging technologies, responsible research on nanotechnology, and research on political corporate social responsibility. As a result, the research development of responsible research and innovation in China is suggested to strengthen the role of policy leadership, follow the international frontier hotspots and key research directions, and pay attention to empirical research. |
| |
| Keywords: | responsible research responsible innovation research ethics bibliometrics master path analysis combining qualitative and quantitative |
|
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
