| 谈“诗言志”的两种不同理解 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 严金东.谈“诗言志”的两种不同理解[J].重庆教育学院学报,2010,23(5):121-124. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 严金东 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆教育学院文学与传媒系,重庆,400067 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对“诗言志”的理解可以有两种：实然理解和应然理解。前者着眼于中国诗歌发生史、或一般诗歌发生过程、或中国诗学思想发生发展史等，是站在现实层面上阐说“诗言志”——诗歌“事实如何”；后者着眼于儒家诗学原则的定位，是站在理想层面上阐说“诗言志”——诗歌“应该如何”。
|
| 关 键 词： | 诗言志 实然理解 应然理解 |
Two different interpretations of the idea of "Poem Expressing" |
| |
| YAN Jin-dong.Two different interpretations of the idea of "Poem Expressing"[J].Journal of Chongqing College of Education,2010,23(5):121-124. |
| |
| Authors: | YAN Jin-dong |
| |
| Institution: | YAN Jin-dong (Department of Literature and Media, Chongqing Education College, Chongqing 400067, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | There are usually two interpretations about ＂Poem Expressing＂： historical and idealistic. The former focuses on the origin of Chinese poetry or the history of the general process of poetry, or the development of Chinese poetic thoughts and so on. It stands at the reality level to illustrate the idea of ＂Poem Expressing＂ ---- what poetry is. The latter focuses on the positioning of the Confucian poetic principles. It stands at the ideal level to illustrate it what poetry should be. |
| |
| Keywords: | Poem Expressing historical interpretation ideal interpretation |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
