首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国社会性质问题论战中之资本主义社会说
引用本文:阿荣.中国社会性质问题论战中之资本主义社会说[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,40(6):44-47,63.
作者姓名:阿荣
作者单位:内蒙古师范大学,内蒙古呼和浩特,010022
摘    要:在中国社会性质问题论战中认为中国是资本主义社会的派别和个人比较多。他们高估中国资本主义力量,认为中国是资本主义社会。持资本主义社会说的主要有两大派别,最具代表性的是托派。托派观点有一个不断深化的过程。苏联托派是资本主义社会说的提出者,陈独秀是中国托派最具影响力的代表,他关于中国社会性质问题的见解是中国托派最具代表性的观点。在托派中持最极端最片面观点的是"动力"派,刘仁静的观点则离客观现实最近。资本主义社会说作为直接对立面,为马克思主义者和我党正确认识中国社会性质问题和中国革命根本问题起到了催生作用。

关 键 词:中国社会性质问题论战  资本主义社会  托派

On the Capitalist Society Theory in the Debate about the Social Nature of China
ARONG.On the Capitalist Society Theory in the Debate about the Social Nature of China[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University (Philosophy & Social Science),2011,40(6):44-47,63.
Authors:ARONG
Institution:ARONG(Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia,China 010022)
Abstract:In the debate about the social nature of China,there were more schools and individuals who thought that China was a capitalist society.They overestimated the strength of Chinese capitalism,thinking China was a capitalist society.There were mainly two schools which advocated the capitalist society theory,and the most important representative was the Trotskyism School which furthered its view gradually.Trotskyism school in the Soviet Union advanced the capitalist society theory,and Chen Duxiu was its most influential representative in China whose understanding about the nature of Chinese society was the most typical of the Trotskyism school in China.Among the Trotskyism school,the "Dynamic school" held the extremely radical and one-sided ideas,while Liu Jingren’s ideas were the closest to objective reality.The capitalist society theory as a direct opposition helped Marxists and our party to understand correctly the nature of Chinese society and the fundamental problems of Chinese revolution.
Keywords:debate about the social nature of China  capitalist society  Trotskyism School
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号