| 百年中国古文献学研究的反思与前瞻专题——论百年古籍整理与古文献学科发展史的梳理与意义 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周少川.百年中国古文献学研究的反思与前瞻专题——论百年古籍整理与古文献学科发展史的梳理与意义[J].廊坊师范学院学报,2013(2):31-35. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周少川 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京师范大学古籍与传统文化研究院,北京100875 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金重大项目“百年中国古籍整理与古文献学科发展研究”（1I＆ZDl09）的阶段性成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 总结百年古文献学研究所取得的成就，反思存在的问题，把握古文献学的发展态势，拓展研究空间，深化研究内容，提出前瞻性对策，是传承和创新中华文化、建设古文献学科、促进学术发展的重要任务，当然也是置于21世纪古文献学研究首位的课题。针对这些问题，我们特别邀请了三位教授从不同角度进行了探讨。周少川教授的文章阐明了梳理百年中国古籍整理和古文献学研究的意义，指出要从纵横两个方面对百年中国古籍整理和古文献学研究进行总结，纵向按照古籍整理和古文献学科建设两条主线进行考察，横向按照基本史实、方法论、基本理论和学科理论四个层面进行剖析，以期探寻古籍整理与古文献学发展的规律，明确古文献学研究的方向。王记录教授的论文讨论了21世纪古文献学研究亟待深化的五个问题，即古文献学科自身的理论体系和研究范式亟待建立、中国古代文献学思想遗产需要发掘、少数民族文献学在中国古文献学中的地位需要得到进一步体现、中西文献学的比较研究亟待加强、古籍数字化理论和方法研究亟待深入。张升教授的论文论述了兴起于西方的新书籍史研究对古文献学研究的启示，认为新书籍史扩大了古文献学研究的视野，拓展了古文献学的研究范围，其引进社会史、文化史的研究方法使人看到文献研究所具有的社会史和文化史意义，古文献学研究要眼光向下，借鉴多学科交叉的方法，丰富自身的研究内容。以下刊出他们的精彩论述，希望能对关注这一问题的读者有所启发，也希望能引发同行诸君的更多高论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 百年 古籍整理 古文献学 少数民族文献学 西方文献学 古籍数字化 新书籍史 |
Reflection and Prospective Symposium of the Centennial Studies of Ancient Chinese Philology |
| |
| Abstract: | It is both an important task and optimal subject of the 21st century philology to summarize the achievements of centennial ancient philology, reflect the current issues, grasp the development trend of ancient literature studies, expand research space, enrich the research contents, and put forward farsighted countermeasures for inhering and innovating Chinese culture, establishing ancient philology, and promoting academic development. To solve these problems, we organized a symposium of three articles. Professor Zhou Shaochuan＇s article clarifies the significance of centennial Chinese ancient books and ancient philology, pointing out two aspects of China＇s ancient books in the 20th century and the ancient literature studies： diachronic investigation following two main lines of collection of ancient books and establishment of ancient philology, and synchronic analysis from four aspects, that is, basic historical facts, methodology, basic principles, and scientific theorizing, in order to explore the development law of collection of ancient books and ancient philology, and specify the direction of ancient philology. Professor Wang Jilu＇s article discusses five urgent issues in ancient philology of the 21st century： theoretical system and research paradigm, philological heritages, the position of philology of ethnic minorities, comparative study of Chinese and Western philology, theories and methods in digitalization of ancient books, etc. Professor Zhang Sheng＇s article discusses the implication of Western new history of books for ancient philology, and argues that new history of books expands the horizon and scope of ancient philology. The introduction of methodology of social history and cultural history makes it clear that philology has social and cultural significance. Ancient philology should become solid and draw on interdisciplinary methods to enrich the content of its own research. |
| |
| Keywords: | centennial collecting ancient books ancient philology ethnic minority philology Western philology digitalization of ancient books new history of books |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
