首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《牟子理惑论》为佛教辩护的主要思路
引用本文:苏道玉,肖太国.《牟子理惑论》为佛教辩护的主要思路[J].十堰职业技术学院学报,2006,19(6):68-69.
作者姓名:苏道玉  肖太国
作者单位:1. 西南大学,美术学院,重庆,400715
2. 西南大学,政治与公共管理学院,重庆,400715
摘    要:现存《理惑论》是一部为佛教辩护的著作,它为佛教进行辩护的主要思想方法是“格义法”,具体内容可以归纳为三个方面:在崇拜对象方面,把佛解释为中国传说中的远古帝王和道家的神仙;在思想观念上,用道家、儒家经典解释佛教术语努力调和佛教与儒家、道家的矛盾,缩小它们之间的差距;在行为礼仪方面,求内在精神之“大同”,存外在表现之“小异”。这对于佛教得到当时更多人的理解是有很大帮助的。

关 键 词:牟子理惑论  佛教  辩护
文章编号:1008-4738(2006)06-0068-02
收稿时间:2006-10-16
修稿时间:2006年10月16

On principle threads to defend Buddhism in Muzi's Theory for Clarifying Confusion
SU Dao-yu,XIAO Tai-guo.On principle threads to defend Buddhism in Muzi''''s Theory for Clarifying Confusion[J].Journal of Shiyan Technical Institute,2006,19(6):68-69.
Authors:SU Dao-yu  XIAO Tai-guo
Abstract:The current book Muzi's Theory for Clarifying Confusion,which defends Buddhism by a methodology called Ge Yi,can be classified into three aspects in its content.The first aspect is mainly about idol pursuing,which explains Buddha to be ancient king of Chinese legend and the immortal of Daoism.The second endeavors to harmonize the contradiction between Daoism and Confucius with regard to thinking concept,and then decreases their differences by using classics in their explanation of Buddhism terminology.The third,with the focus on behavior and etiquette,aims to pursue major similarities in spiritual fields while keep minor difference in physical ones.those theories helped majority commoners' understanding of Buddhism at that time.
Keywords:Muzi's Theory for Clarifying Confusion  Buddhism  defense  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号