| 论《文心雕龙·体性》篇的“理论缺省” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵新.论《文心雕龙·体性》篇的“理论缺省”[J].内江师范学院学报,2008,23(9):51-55. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵新 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京师范大学文学院,北京100875 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刘勰在《文心雕龙·体性》篇提出了“体由性定”的文学思想。按行文的内在理路，刘勰应该阐明文体创造的根本动因，即创作者的思想情性问题，但是刘氏选择用低层次的“形式训练”（摹体以定习）的办法来创造文体，并视之为“文之司南”。故此，刘勰在阐发如何解决根本问题的途径上，出现了理论漏洞，这是刘勰在面对理论困境时使用了“分身术”的缘故。清代学者章学诚在《文史通义·质性》诸篇对《体性》篇的理论漏洞做了修补。
|
| 关 键 词： | “理论缺省” 体由性定 章学诚的“药” 《质性》篇 |
On the Theoretical Default of the Article"Style Determined by One's Nature"in The Literature Mind and the Carving of Dragon |
| |
| ZHAO Xin.On the Theoretical Default of the Article"Style Determined by One''s Nature"in The Literature Mind and the Carving of Dragon[J].Journal of Neijiang Teachers College,2008,23(9):51-55. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHAO Xin |
| |
| Institution: | ZHAO Xin (School of Literature, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875) |
| |
| Abstract: | LIU Xie put forward the literary idea that ＂the style is determined by nature＂ in The Literature Mind and the Carving of Dragon： Nature and Form. According to the inherent idea of writing, Liu Xie should have taken great efforts to clarify the fundamental cause of the writing of the form, namely, the writer＇s nature and disposition; but he chose to use the lowlevel approach - the form training -to create literature style, and took it as ＂the compass of writing＂. Therefore, there was a theory loophole in choosing the way how to tackle the fundamental issue which is because LIU played ＂hideaway＂ in the face of theoretical difficulty. The scholar ZHANG Xue-cheng in Qing Dynasty repaired the loophole in the article The General Literary History： Nature and Disposition. |
| |
| Keywords: | theoretical default style determined by nature the medicine of ZHANG Xue-cheng the article Nature and Disposition |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
