首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于WoS和CSCD的肿瘤类高被引文章分析
引用本文:倪明,闫雷,陆瑶,王琳辉,汤燕明,李广涛.基于WoS和CSCD的肿瘤类高被引文章分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(12):1311-1318.
作者姓名:倪明  闫雷  陆瑶  王琳辉  汤燕明  李广涛
作者单位:复旦大学附属肿瘤医院《中国癌症杂志》编辑部, 复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系, 上海市东安路270号 200032,中国医科大学医学信息学系, 辽宁省沈阳市沈北新区蒲河路77号 110122,复旦大学附属肿瘤医院《中国癌症杂志》编辑部, 复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系, 上海市东安路270号 200032,复旦大学附属肿瘤医院《中国癌症杂志》编辑部, 复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系, 上海市东安路270号 200032,复旦大学附属肿瘤医院《中国癌症杂志》编辑部, 复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系, 上海市东安路270号 200032,复旦大学附属肿瘤医院《中国癌症杂志》编辑部, 复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系, 上海市东安路270号 200032
基金项目:上海市高校科技期刊研究基金资助
摘    要:目的]对WoS和CSCD数据库中1000篇肿瘤类高被引文献的特点进行分析,以期为杂志组稿约稿提供依据。方法]分别检索2005-2014年间WoS和CSCD数据库中年被引频次前50的肿瘤类文献,分析其第一作者、总被引频次、发表后1~5年内被引频次、文章类型、作者单位、基金情况、学科分布、研究内容和研究方向等,并对其进行统计分析。结果]WoS数据库中高被引文献的被引频次远高于CSCD数据库(29218.5±16693.9)次vs. (552.3±308.7)次]。高被引文献中,论著类文章占比重较高(72.8%),且在文章发表后5年内,年被引频次波动不大。流行病学研究、大型临床多中心试验研究、指南类文章以及知名专家述评是被引用的热点文章。结论]国内外文献学术质量仍存在较大差距。杂志组稿应从流行病类文章、知名专家述评以及多中心临床试验入手,以提高整体被引频次以及学术质量。

关 键 词:高被引文章  引文分析  肿瘤  Web  of  Science  中国科学引文数据库
收稿时间:2015/7/31 0:00:00
修稿时间:2015/10/29 0:00:00

The citation analysis of articles about cancer based on WOS and CSCD databases
NI Ming,YAN Lei,LU Yao,WANG Linhui,TANG Yanming and LI Guangtao.The citation analysis of articles about cancer based on WOS and CSCD databases[J].Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals,2015,26(12):1311-1318.
Authors:NI Ming  YAN Lei  LU Yao  WANG Linhui  TANG Yanming and LI Guangtao
Institution:Editorial Board of China Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, China,Department of Medical Informatics, China Medical University, 77Puhe Road, Shenbei New Distance, Liaoning 200032, China,Editorial Board of China Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, China,Editorial Board of China Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, China,Editorial Board of China Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, China and Editorial Board of China Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, and Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong'an Road, Shanghai 200032, China
Abstract:Purposes] The research analyzed the characteristic of 1000 highly cited cancer articles in Web of Science (WoS) database and Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), and was to provide the base for soliciting contribution.Methods] The articles about cancer with top 50 citation frequency in these two databases from 2005 to 2014 were searched out in last 10 years. The characteristics of first author, citation frequency, citation frequency within 5 years after publishing, article type, authors' units, funding, subject distribution, research contents, etc. were explained.Findings] We found that the citation frequency of the articles in WOS was far more than those in CSCD(29218.5±16693.9) times vs. (552.3±308.7)times]. 72.8% of highly cited papers were articles, and there was no difference in citation frequency within 5 years after the articles were published. We need to pay more attention to the epidemiologic study, the multi-center clinical study, guidelines and reviews of famous experts which can get high citation frequency.Conclusions] There is still a large gap of the academic quality between the articles in these two databases. We should pay more attention to articles of the epidemiologic study, multi-center clinical study, guidelines and reviews of famous experts for raising the citation frequency and academic quality of our journals.
Keywords:Highly cited article  Citation analysis  Cancer  Web of Science  Chinese Science Citation Database
点击此处可从《中国科技期刊研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国科技期刊研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号