| “南”“风”辨说 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 林东海.“南”“风”辨说[J].南京师范大学文学院学报,2007(2):1-9. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 林东海 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 人民文学出版社,古代室,北京,1013705 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 传统《诗经》分类，二“南”归入“国风”。宋人疑经，以为孔子时代无“国风”之名，只有乐名“南”、“雅”、“颂”；于是倡“南”独立于“风”外之说，自宋至今未有定论。本文辨说“南”与“风”为同音假借，“南”就是“风”，记乐时代用“南”，说诗时代用“风”。在诗教传承中“南”演化为“风”，在音乐传承中“南”又派生出“乱”、“盐”、“艳”等音乐名词。
|
| 关 键 词： | “南” “风” 同音假借传承与演化 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-9853（2007）02-001-09 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-01-18 |
The Differences between "Nans" and "Feng" |
| |
| Lin Donghai.The Differences between "Nans" and "Feng"[J].Journal of Chinese Language and Culture School Nanjing Normal University,2007(2):1-9. |
| |
| Authors: | Lin Donghai |
| |
| Institution: | Lin Donghai |
| |
| Abstract: | According to the traditional classification of The Book of Songs （ 《诗经》）, two ＂Nans＂（ 南 ） are included in ＂Guo Feng＂（ 国风）. The scholars in the Song Dynasty thought there was no ＂Guo Feng＂ in the time of Confucius, but only the music names of ＂Nan＂ （ 南 ）, ＂Ya＂ （雅）, ＂Song＂ （ 颂 ）. They held the theory that ＂Nan＂ was independent of ＂Feng＂. No final conclusion has yet been reached on this matter since the Song Dynasty. This article argues that ＂Nan＂ and ＂Feng＂ are homo-phonetic loan characters. ＂Nan＂ and ＂Feng＂ are the one and the same thing. ＂Nan＂ was used for music, while ＂Feng＂ was used in the time of poetry. ＂Nan＂evolved to ＂Feng＂ in the history of poetry, while in the evolution of music, ＂Nan＂ derived into other music names such as ＂Luan＂ （乱）, ＂Yan＂（ 盐）, ＂Yan＂ （艳）, etc. |
| |
| Keywords: | ＂Nans＂（ 南 ） ＂Feng＂（风） homo- phonetic loan characters evolvement and evolution |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
