| 台湾刑事诉讼中的实质辩护 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谢易颖.台湾刑事诉讼中的实质辩护[J].太原大学学报,2012,13(2):16-21. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谢易颖 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京,100088 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 即便法条有规定辩护权，辩护人在强制辩护案件未必会尽力，因此台湾学说与判决发展出没有实质辩护就等于未经有效辩护的理论。然而大陆地区因为如实回答义务和律师伪证罪等规定阻碍律师为充分之辩护，为了发现案情真实及保障人权宜引进该理论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 发现真实 诉讼经济 保障人权 律师泄密 不自证己罪 |
Substantial Defense in Taiwan Criminal Suit |
| |
| XIE Yi-ying.Substantial Defense in Taiwan Criminal Suit[J].Journal of Taiyuan University,2012,13(2):16-21. |
| |
| Authors: | XIE Yi-ying |
| |
| Institution: | XIE Yi-ying(School of Criminal Justice,China Politics and Law University,Beijing 100088,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | A defender does not necessarily make effort in a compulsory defense case though the law provides him the right to defense.So Taiwan doctrine and judgment develop a theory that there’s no effective defense where there’s no substantial defense.However,in the mainland district,the obligation of truthful answer and the crime of lawyer perjury hinder the lawyers from adequate defenses.It is necessary to introduce this Taiwan theory in order to find the reality of a case and safeguard human rights. |
| |
| Keywords: | find reality litigation economy safeguard human rights a lawyer divulges a secret not prove one’s own offense by himself |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
