| “道“、“德“与“道德“ |
| |
| 引用本文： | 罗炽.“道“、“德“与“道德“[J].郧阳师范高等专科学校学报,2002,22(1):113-119. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 罗炽 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖北大学人文学院,哲学系,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 分三个层面对“道德”范畴的形成及其内涵进行了历史考察 ,认为是道家老子最先将“道”升华为哲学范畴 ,认为“德”作为政治伦理范畴 ,形成于西周 ,较“道”为早。“道德”连用虽散见于先秦典籍 ,但作为哲学范畴 ,当确定于《庄子》。而《老子》之“尊道贵德”、《论语》之“志于道 ,据于德”、《中庸》之“苟不至德 ,至道不凝焉”等论题 ,都是“道德”范畴的先声。
|
| 关 键 词： | 道 德 道德 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6072(2002)01-0113-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年9月8日 |
"Taoism","Virtue" and "Morality" |
| |
| LUO Zhi."Taoism","Virtue" and "Morality"[J].Journal of Yunyang Teachers College,2002,22(1):113-119. |
| |
| Authors: | LUO Zhi |
| |
| Abstract: | A historical investigation is made from three levels on the form and content of the scope of "morality". The following conclusions are made: Laozi was the first person to lift"morality"into a philosophical concept;"virtue'as a political and ethical concept, appeared around West Zhou Dynasty, earlier than Taoism";"morality", the combination of the two words, as a philosophical concept, should have first appeared in Zhuangzi; and there had been earlier commentaries on"morality" in such Chinese classical works as Laozi, The Analects of Confucius, and The Doctrine of the Mean. |
| |
| Keywords: | Taoism virtue morality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
