| 中国人文社会科学各学科研究论文特征的计量分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 汤建民.中国人文社会科学各学科研究论文特征的计量分析[J].科学学研究,2011,29(7):991-998. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 汤建民 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江树人大学科学计量学研究中心，浙江杭州 310015 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学规划课题(09YJA870027) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国人文社会科学内部各学科之间在学科性质、学科规模、学科研究的合作生产方式、学科知识的积累方式、学科和现实生活的距离等方面仍存在着明显的差异，为了定量地揭示中国人文社会科学研究的整体特性和细致地梳理内部各学科之间的联系和区别，依据2008年CSSCI库收录的八万多篇论文数据，定量地计算了法学、管理学、经济学、历史学、社会学、心理学、哲学、政治学等22个主要学科研究论文的大尺度特征，指标包括：论文总数、作者总数、期刊数、篇均作者人数、合著比例、关键词总数、关键词分布的集散度、交叉学科论文比例、论文参考文献中的中外文比例等10多个方面。以定量方式较系统地反映出了当代中国人文社会科学的整体特性以及各主要学科的学科性质和学科发展的模式、特征和规律，这些“基本数据”可以为中国人文科学的评价研究和各种管理制度的设计奠定基础，也可以为今后各学科的文献计量研究结果的进一步解释提供参考。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国人文社会科学研究 学科发展模式 文献计量 学科性质 评价研究 |
| 收稿时间： | 1900-01-01; |
General features of social scientific studies of China |
| |
| TANG Jian-min.General features of social scientific studies of China[J].Studies in Science of Science,2011,29(7):991-998. |
| |
| Authors: | TANG Jian-min |
| |
| Institution: | TANG Jian-min (Research Center for Scientometrics of Zhejiang Shuren University,Hangzhou 310015,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | There exist obvious differences among the various disciplines within the range of social science in China—in the aspects of discipline nature,discipline scale,the cooperative producing mode of discipline research,the accumulating mechanism of discipline knowledge,the gap between the discipline and real life,as well as others.In order to reveal the general features of China's social scientific study,and to sort the affinities and differences among the various disciplines within it,this paper has analyzed the 80,000 theses included in CSSCI of 2008,and has accordingly studied in a quantitative way the general features of research papers in 22 major disciplines,among which are law,management,economics,history,sociology,psychology,philosophy,politics and others.The research indicators are including: the total number of theses,the total number of authors,the number of periodicals,the average author numbers of a single thesis,the percentage of coauthoring,the total number of Key words,the concentration of key words distribution,the percentage of cross-discipline theses,and the proportion of Chinese references to foreign language ones in bibliography.Therefore,in a quantitative way,this paper has systematically revealed the general features of social science of modern China,the nature of a variety of major disciplines,as well as the mode,characteristic and pattern of discipline development.These basic figures of my paper could serve as a foundation for the evaluative study of China's social science and for the design of various management systems.They could also provide a reference for the further expounding of the literature measurement results in future researches of various disciplines. |
| |
| Keywords: | social scientific research of China the discipline developing mode literature measurement discipline nature evaluative study |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科学学研究》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
