| 刑事和解与中国古代法文化的若干断想 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 赵晶.刑事和解与中国古代法文化的若干断想[J].保定师专学报,2011(5):60-63,82. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 赵晶 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学法学院,北京100088 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中国政法大学创新实践活动资助项目“刑事和解中当事人合意形成机制研究” |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在征诸传统法文化以论证构建刑事和解制度的正当性的研究中,存在一些对史料进行片面解读与过度诠释的情况：如未妥善解决中国古代的刑事与民事的区分问题,从而有混淆民事调解与刑事和解之嫌;又如过度诠释保辜制度,因为无论是从该制度见诸记载的最早文献出发,还是立足于作为传统法典代表的《唐律疏议》及吐鲁番出土文献所见的案例,皆无法推出保辜制度与刑事和解之间存在直接关联。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法文化 刑事诉讼 刑事和解 刑民之分 保辜制度 司法理念 |
Thought on the Criminal Reconciliation and Legal Culture in the Ancient China |
| |
| Zhao Jing.Thought on the Criminal Reconciliation and Legal Culture in the Ancient China[J].Journal of Baoding Teachers College,2011(5):60-63,82. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhao Jing |
| |
| Institution: | Zhao Jing(Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | In the research on the demonstration of the legitimacy of structuring the system of the criminal reconciliation on the basis of the legal culture in the ancient China,there are some mistakes caused by the exaggerate interpretation on the historical materials.For example,it may confuse the civil mediation with the criminal reconciliation without solving the problem of the division of the cirminal case and the civil case in ancient China;And some opinions exaggerately interpret the Baogu system（the system of victim protection）.According to the earliest literature,Tanglvshuyi and Turfan documents about the Baogu,we can＇t prove that there is the direct relationship between the Baogu and the criminal reconciliation. |
| |
| Keywords: | legal culture criminal procedure criminal reconciliation division of the criminal case and the civil case Baogu system judicial ideas |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
