首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论我国刑事审判直接、言词原则的完善
引用本文:石中光.论我国刑事审判直接、言词原则的完善[J].怀化学院学报,1999(4).
作者姓名:石中光
作者单位:怀化师专马列部!湖南怀化,418008
摘    要:直接、言词原则是我国刑事诉讼的一项基本原则,对法官查清证据,进而查清事实,公正判案具有关键性的意义,但我国新刑事诉讼法对此仍规定不力,缺乏具体落实措施。为此,有必要完善现行刑事审判直接、言词原则,一是规定证人拒证的法律责任;二是完善证人出庭作证的保护措施;三是建立规范的证人出庭经济补偿制度;四是加强法制宣传教育,提高公民的法律意识。

关 键 词:直接  言词原则  刑事审判  完善

On Perfection of the Principle of Direct Evidence for Criminal Adjudication in Our Country
Shi Zhongguang.On Perfection of the Principle of Direct Evidence for Criminal Adjudication in Our Country[J].Journal of Huaihua University,1999(4).
Authors:Shi Zhongguang
Abstract:The principle of direct evidence is one of the basic principles for instituting penal proceedings in our coun-try, it is of key importance for judges to check up on the testimony, then the facts, and to have a fair verdict. But thenew code of criminal procedure in our country lacks concrete workable measures. Therefore, it is necaseary to perfect thecurrent principle of direct evidence for criminal adjudication. The first is to stipulate legal responsibility the witness shouldhear if he refuse to give evidence. The Second is to perfect the protective measures for the witness appearing in court. Thethird is to establish standard economic compensation systems for the witness appearing in court. The fourth is to strengthenpropaganda and education in legality to raise the citizens' legal consciousness.
Keywords:principle of direct evidence  criminal adjudication  perfection
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号