首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

"欲":老子和庄子之间的异
引用本文:崔珍皙."欲":老子和庄子之间的异[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,45(6):72-77.
作者姓名:崔珍皙
作者单位:韩国西江大学,哲学科,韩国
摘    要:本文以“欲”这一主题为媒介,考察了先秦哲学的变化。中国哲学从老子在内的早期三位哲学家(另二位是孔子、墨子)到发展为战国中期的稷下学,其哲学视角从“整体”或“一般”转向“个别”、“具体”、“主体”等。老子和庄子都主张“寡欲”和“无欲”。但老子否定“欲”是与统治有关,庄子否定“欲”则主要是与个别主体的“欲”有关,即减少或消除欲望以获得心理的平静之后达到内心的超越,最终赢得个别主体的自由。

关 键 词:“欲”  老子  庄子  差异
文章编号:1000-2456(2006)06-0072-06
收稿时间:06 22 2006 12:00AM
修稿时间:2006年6月22日

The Difference View Between Laotzu And Zhuangzi On "Yu"
CUI Zhen-xi.The Difference View Between Laotzu And Zhuangzi On "Yu"[J].Journal of Central China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2006,45(6):72-77.
Authors:CUI Zhen-xi
Institution:Department of Philosophy, Korean Xijiang University
Abstract:This paper,taking Yu as a media,analyzes the development of Philosophy in Pre-Qin Dynasty.From the famous philopher,Laotzu,Confucius,Mozi in ancient time to Jixiaxue in the middle of the wartimes.Chinese philosophy turns its view from the whole,general to the concrete,individual,subjective.Both Laotzu and Zhuangzi exphasize "WuYu" and "Gua Yu".Laotzu deny the relation betwwen Yu and governning.Zhuangzi deny Yu because he thinks reducing or elimilating desire people can reach the realm of calmness so as to reach a kind of innate transcendence and obtain the final individual freedom.
Keywords:"Yu"  Laotzu  Zhuangzi  differnece
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号