Philosophies and ethics of the project archive |
| |
| Authors: | Marek Tesar Sonja Arndt |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand;2. Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand |
| |
| Abstract: | Archival research can be described as preoccupied with the ontology of data formation and collection in relation to the speaking and writing subject. From its outset, it can be located in the humanistic tradition, which the archival and historical discipline has inherited. Thus, archival research can be described as preoccupied with the ontology of data formation and collection in relation to the speaking and writing subject. At the same time, the archival researcher—the human subject—is produced as the sole source of subjective experiences, consciousness and feelings, and has become the central player in this tradition, embedded in debates over the concept of human autonomy in archival research. Archival researchers—human subjects—should be continually challenged by their own discipline, and by such arguably scientific methods, which often espouse rejecting their ethical commitments to idiosyncrasy, entanglements and the blurring of subject–object binaries. An approach that re-elevates these commitments, we argue, raises the importance of archival research as an ethically non-neutral philosophical project. |
| |
| Keywords: | Archives materiality power history of education ethics human exceptionalism new materialism posthumanism |
|
|
