首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《文心雕龙》的文体分类论——和《昭明文选》文体分类的比较
引用本文:张少康.《文心雕龙》的文体分类论——和《昭明文选》文体分类的比较[J].江苏理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,9(1):50-56.
作者姓名:张少康
作者单位:北京大学中文系,北京100871
摘    要:《昭明文选》和《文心雕龙》都对文体加以分类,特别重视诗和赋两种文体。但它们是两部性质不同的书,对文学分类的角度也不尽相同。《文心雕龙》作为一部理论著作,重在研究和阐述各类文体的历史发展及创作特征;而《昭明文选》是一部文学作品的选本,重点在选出各类文体中最优秀的代表性作品。前者偏重于从文学理论方面去研究文体的类别,而后者则偏重于从文学创作角度区别不同文体。前者以理论为标准,不论作品好坏,只要有理论上的意义,就需要提出来讨论;后者以创作为标准,选出优秀作品,有些文类没有好作品,则可以不选。

关 键 词:《文心雕龙》  《昭明文选》  文体分类
文章编号:1671-6604(2007)01-0050-07
收稿时间:2006-10-14

On the Classification of Genre in The Literary Mind and the Carving Dragon--A Comparison with Zhaoming Wenxuan
ZHANG Shao-kang.On the Classification of Genre in The Literary Mind and the Carving Dragon--A Comparison with Zhaoming Wenxuan[J].Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences),2007,9(1):50-56.
Authors:ZHANG Shao-kang
Abstract:Both Zhaoming Wenxuan and The Literary Mind and the Carving Dragon classify the genres and pay particular attention to lyric poetry and rhapsodies. But as they are books of quite different natures, they classify the genres in different ways. The Literary Mind and the Carving Dragon, as a theoretic work, studies and expounds the historical development and creative features of various genres while Zhaoming Wenxuan, as an anthology, aims to include in it the best and most representative works of various genres. The former approaches the genres in light of literary theory while the latter in light of creation. The former, based on theory, would discuss any work, good or bad, if they have theoretic meanings while the latter, based on creation, would only pick out good works and exclude those genres where no good work is available.
Keywords:The Literary Mind and the Carving Dragon  Zhaoming Wenxttan  classification of genres
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号