| 是渴望"血性"还是缅怀"血腥" |
| |
| 引用本文： | 程戈.是渴望"血性"还是缅怀"血腥"[J].齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报,2003,22(4):41-43. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 程戈 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 东北师范大学,文学院,吉林,长春,130024 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 作家和学对当下生活的认识和判断是一个美学问题，也是一个伦理学问题。对人类历史的无视和对人类一般道德立场的挑战都不是作家和学的特权。美化人类历史的罪恶更不是作家和学的特权。将血腥的历史解释成为有血性的历史，而且还要将这样的历史加以粉饰和赞美，这种现象在一些学作品和理论章里时有表达，本对韩少功和徐葆耕的两部(篇)代表性作品中的观点作了批判性的讨论，从史实、对待史实的态度、作家与学的底线、化的域限与原因等方面进行了深入的探讨。
|
| 关 键 词： | “血腥” 《让血性冲破牢笼》 文学创作 文学批评 韩少功 徐葆耕 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-3958(2003)04-0041-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年6月18日 |
Hungry for uprightness or Recallmg Bloody |
| |
| CHENG Ge.Hungry for uprightness or Recallmg Bloody[J].Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers‘ College,2003,22(4):41-43. |
| |
| Authors: | CHENG Ge |
| |
| Abstract: | What the writers and scholars recognize and judge is an aesthetic problem and an ethic problem .it is not the writers' and the scholars' privileges to neglect the human history and to challenge the human general ethic stand .the phenomena of explaining the history to be courageous and upright and even prettifying and eulogizing such a history sometimes are expressed in some literary works and theoretic papers .in this paper I critically discuss and deeply explore two representative papers separately written by Han Shaogong and Xu Baogeng,about the historic facts, the attitudes to the facts,the fields and causes of the writers' and the scholars'basic standards . |
| |
| Keywords: | CourageousanduprightHistory Aesthetics Basic Standard Conscience |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
